A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Western Digital Red?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 1st 16, 12:30 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Neill Massello[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default Western Digital Red?

Yousuf Khan wrote:

So 5000's would have the same amount of data/inch as 7200's.


For the same generation of drives, yes. Over time, the "areal density"
of hard drives has increased, so the same amount of data can be read or
written with fewer head movements (seeks) and platter rotations
(latency). That means a higher density drive will, on average, perform
better than a lower density drive of the same rotational (spindle)
speed, even without improvements in caching.

Note that there are two flavors of WD Red drives: a base version that
runs at 5400rpm and a Pro (higher priced) version that spins at 7200rpm.
So far, I'm very happy with the standard Reds in my RAID box.

  #12  
Old December 5th 16, 04:37 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Rod Speed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,559
Default Western Digital Red?



"Yousuf Khan" wrote in message
...
On 11/24/2016 4:35 AM, mike wrote:
On 11/23/2016 7:32 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Yes, I noticed that it's a slower-speed drive. Does it really make a
huge difference that a drive is either 5400/5900 RPM these days with
64MB caches onboard?

Yousuf Khan

A few years back, I updated a laptop from 5400 to 7200RPM.
Made a significant difference in how fast it "felt".


True, but I've also recently noticed that some newer 7200's feel a lot
faster than older 7200's, without any change in rotational speeds.


Want matters is the speed the sectors pass under the heads.
Bet the difference is just due to more sectors per track.

I'm assuming it's due disk caching.


Unlikely.

So given identical disk caching, will a 5900 feel pretty fast too?


Unlikely.

  #13  
Old December 26th 16, 05:51 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 220
Default Western Digital Red?

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 7:05:40 AM UTC+8, Percival P. Cassidy wrote:

1. Drives designed for NAS use *may* run at a lower speed, e.g.,
5400/5900rpm rather than 7200rpm. They probably run a little cooler this
way. I think this is true of WD Red drives.

2. They may be designed to minimize rotational and other vibration that
could affect other drives in the same enclosure.

As with any brand, some people love the Reds for NAS use, but I just
read a post on the FreeNAS forum by someone who will never buy another Red.


Apart from that, red drives are designed for RAID. So they handle errors
differently from blue drives.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Western Digital RMA? Davej Homebuilt PC's 6 September 15th 13 07:59 AM
OT Western Digital WD TV Metspitzer Homebuilt PC's 9 March 5th 10 03:27 AM
OT Western Digital WD TV [email protected] Homebuilt PC's 0 March 2nd 10 02:52 AM
OT Western Digital WD TV [email protected] Homebuilt PC's 0 March 2nd 10 12:43 AM
Western Digital didnt_say Storage (alternative) 2 July 6th 04 11:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.