A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NTFS drive, Windows 2000 and "Write Signature"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 18th 07, 06:25 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Steve Cousins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default NTFS drive, Windows 2000 and "Write Signature"

A researcher gave me a 320 GB SATA drive from a Windows XP machine that
he wants to have access to. I put it in a Windows 2000 machine and in
"Disk Management" it shows up as "Unknown". The only option appears to
be "Write Signature". Could doing this be a bad thing as far as being
able to access the data on the disk?

I have used "FinalData Enterprise" to see if there is data on the drive
and it finds two NTFS partitions with data. All looks fine. I can use
this to get the data now but it would obviously be better to have it
accessible the normal way. I just don't want to write the "Signature"
and then find that I can't even get the data via Final Data. I doubt if
this would happen but I'm not up on Windows so I'd like some advice.

As far as I can tell from what searching I've done, the Write Signature
command just deals with the MBR. It is also used to go to a Dynamic
Drive which I don't want to do. Would doing a fdisk /MBR be better?

Bottom line: what is the procedure I should use to safely mount these
partitions on this Win2K machine?

Thanks for your help.

Steve

  #2  
Old June 19th 07, 08:27 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Eric Gisin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 308
Default NTFS drive, Windows 2000 and "Write Signature"

Yes, you need the signature before a drive can be used on Win 2K+.
I suspect they zapped it with fdisk/mbr, causing the problems.

"Steve Cousins" wrote in message
...
A researcher gave me a 320 GB SATA drive from a Windows XP machine that he wants to have access
to. I put it in a Windows 2000 machine and in "Disk Management" it shows up as "Unknown". The
only option appears to be "Write Signature". Could doing this be a bad thing as far as being able
to access the data on the disk?

I have used "FinalData Enterprise" to see if there is data on the drive and it finds two NTFS
partitions with data. All looks fine. I can use this to get the data now but it would obviously
be better to have it accessible the normal way. I just don't want to write the "Signature" and
then find that I can't even get the data via Final Data. I doubt if this would happen but I'm not
up on Windows so I'd like some advice.

As far as I can tell from what searching I've done, the Write Signature command just deals with
the MBR. It is also used to go to a Dynamic Drive which I don't want to do. Would doing a fdisk
/MBR be better?


  #3  
Old June 19th 07, 08:39 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Steve Cousins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default NTFS drive, Windows 2000 and "Write Signature"



Eric Gisin wrote:

Yes, you need the signature before a drive can be used on Win 2K+.
I suspect they zapped it with fdisk/mbr, causing the problems.



Thanks Eric. And putting the signature on the drive will not put the
data that is on the disk at risk?

Steve


"Steve Cousins" wrote in message
...

A researcher gave me a 320 GB SATA drive from a Windows XP machine
that he wants to have access to. I put it in a Windows 2000 machine
and in "Disk Management" it shows up as "Unknown". The only option
appears to be "Write Signature". Could doing this be a bad thing as
far as being able to access the data on the disk?

I have used "FinalData Enterprise" to see if there is data on the
drive and it finds two NTFS partitions with data. All looks fine. I
can use this to get the data now but it would obviously be better to
have it accessible the normal way. I just don't want to write the
"Signature" and then find that I can't even get the data via Final
Data. I doubt if this would happen but I'm not up on Windows so I'd
like some advice.

As far as I can tell from what searching I've done, the Write
Signature command just deals with the MBR. It is also used to go to
a Dynamic Drive which I don't want to do. Would doing a fdisk /MBR
be better?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Operation abort when "write to buffer" on spansion FLASH s29gl128n Cheng General 0 January 23rd 07 02:44 PM
Windows XP does not "see" my new hard drive Stephen Clark Storage (alternative) 4 September 23rd 06 07:53 PM
Packard Bell PB420 motherboard - BIOS error "cannot read/write to CMOS" [email protected] Packard Bell Computers 5 June 28th 06 08:16 PM
new" intel" driver turning off write cache Beemer Biker Storage (alternative) 0 March 27th 06 07:09 PM
"Windows Delayed Write Failed" Ed Cregger Homebuilt PC's 2 March 2nd 06 07:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.