A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Ati Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

3.10 slower than 3.9



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:34 AM
JAD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Since when is 'Scrotie' a diplomat? Besides his atomic weight is insignificant. ;^)




"RipFlex" wrote in message ...
Indeed.

It would have been simpler and more mature if the guy stated: "Various
Benchmarks, like 3dmark####, do not dictate real ingame framerates." Or
something to that nature?

I myself have never used a benchmark other than real games.

Quake3 for my opengl benchmark, UT2003 for my D3D benchmark. I only take
note of Minimum Framerates, and over all Game smoothness of play, and of
course keep a sharp eye to detail - make sure they didn't comprimise visual
quality for my framerates and artifacting etc.

Been awhile for any new OGL games, maybe just Doom3, haven't played the War
FPSes.

"Danny Greaves" wrote in message
...
This whole thread was just too funny!

Thank's
Dan

--end





  #22  
Old December 23rd 03, 11:42 AM
Strontium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


-
RipFlex stood up at show-n-tell, in ,
and said:

Indeed.

It would have been simpler and more mature if the guy stated:
"Various Benchmarks, like 3dmark####, do not dictate real ingame
framerates." Or something to that nature?


Something of that nature, is what I did. It just happens, that some people
take things personally....


I myself have never used a benchmark other than real games.

Quake3 for my opengl benchmark, UT2003 for my D3D benchmark. I only
take note of Minimum Framerates, and over all Game smoothness of
play, and of course keep a sharp eye to detail - make sure they
didn't comprimise visual quality for my framerates and artifacting
etc.

Been awhile for any new OGL games, maybe just Doom3, haven't played
the War FPSes.

"Danny Greaves" wrote in message
...
This whole thread was just too funny!

Thank's
Dan

--end


--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit


  #23  
Old December 24th 03, 12:27 AM
Darthy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:36:43 GMT, Danny Greaves
wrote:

This whole thread was just too funny!


Check out the THREAD in the Nvidia group called:
Mis-representation

Idiot bids on a GF4 card that is advertised as DEFECTIVE and worried
that the product maybe defective.

Links included to the ebay post...


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP! new Athlon 64 slower than athlon XP Idolator#556 Homebuilt PC's 6 November 22nd 04 07:40 PM
P4P800-E Deluxe - Slower to boot Win2K Server Jessica Loriena Asus Motherboards 4 August 18th 04 11:13 AM
A7N8X Deluxe - more memory = slower? or Corsair XMS = slower? Erik Harris Asus Motherboards 2 August 8th 04 06:56 PM
system gradually runs slower...and.....slower........a.n..d.......... ~Aart Homebuilt PC's 11 June 1st 04 02:21 PM
Fast RAM Cas 3 at Slower RAM CAS 2 speed SRV Overclocking AMD Processors 3 February 19th 04 09:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.