If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
Why do the battery powered clocks in personal computers tend to keep
worse time than quartz watches, even the $1 ones? The computer batteries measure fine, at least 3.15V. I thought that the problem was temperature swings in the computers (25-38C), but a couple of cheapo watches taped inside the computers kept better time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
Maybe the same reason we didn't have built-in clocks until after there
were five dollar LCD wris****ches. I don't know. My current clock is very accurate (MSI mainboard). wrote: Why do the battery powered clocks in personal computers tend to keep worse time than quartz watches, even the $1 ones? The computer batteries measure fine, at least 3.15V. I thought that the problem was temperature swings in the computers (25-38C), but a couple of cheapo watches taped inside the computers kept better time. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
somebody wrote Why do the battery powered clocks in personal computers tend to keep worse time than quartz watches, even the $1 ones? Who is the manufacturer? I only use Gigabyte(mostly) or MSI (sometimes) motherboards. I find the clocks to be reasonably accurate. My guess would be that the OEM didn't ground the crystal case or use the proper guard ring techniques for noise reduction. Do you find that they run fast or slow? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
mike wrote: Supply and demand. If your watch kept bad time, you'd send it back. If your computer keeps bad time, you'll reset the clock and bitch about it on the internet. I'm looking for a techical explanation. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?
James Sweet wrote: I have one PC that will lose or gain hours at a time if the machine goes into standby, another that does ok but still drifts enough that I have to use a utility to keep it in sync with the atomic clock. On the other hand a Sun workstation that I fire up occasionally to play with keeps excellent time, even after sitting unplugged for 6 months it's usually within a few seconds but then it was originally $25K. The only PC motherboards I've seen that consistently kept accurate time all had Dallas clock chips in them, and some of those chips were still running properly from their internal lithium cells (permanently encapsulated) 10 years later. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why aren't computer clocks accurate? | DJS0302 | General | 5 | June 11th 04 04:54 PM |
Hewlett-Packard & Circuit City | Richard E Sgrignoli | General | 2 | March 17th 04 09:42 AM |
Major Computer Problems | Toronto Garage Door Company | General | 20 | November 13th 03 09:41 PM |
how to trace a stolen computer ? | General | 3 | October 9th 03 03:14 AM | |
Silent Computer - Advice | David Taylor | General | 49 | October 7th 03 11:26 AM |