If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for planned bonnie++ benchmark
Dear all,
I've posted some time ago and reported problems with latency on our SAN. We've come to the conclusion that we've to run a benchmark, we've suggested bonnie++ and our Datacenter has welcomed that idea. We mainly host DB2 Databases on the SAN and have an application which writes (and reads and then deletes) a lot of tiny to small files. We'd like to run several benchmarks in parallel to identify the bottelnecks (and to bypass the filesstem cache). HW Specs: SAN Box (HDS Thunder 9570V, 2GB, 60x146GB HDD shared with other apps) Server (SUN E12k, 10CPU, 48GB, Dual FC, UFS) Planned benchmark switches: # bonnie++ -b -x 5 -s 8192:32k -n 0 -r 4096 Eight bonnies running in parallel on the data/idx/tmp/log partitions of two databases (4x2 DBs, 32k is the main prefetch size of our DBs) plus # bonnie++ -x 5 -s 10240:32k -n 300:48000:77 -r 5120 for the partition hosting the flatfile based application ....making it a grand total of 9 bonnies (which should hopefully resemble our environment pretty well) What would you change in the benchmark setup? Any comments are appreciated. Cheers, Jochen P.S. I ran the two benchmarks in seqential order on a standard PC, the first took about 2.5h, the latter about 20h. As expected the block throughput was about ~35-40MB/s, about half that for Chr based transactions. The file creation benchmark really showed the limits of my PC at approx. 330/320 writes, 70/60 reads and 400/150 deletes per sequential/random action. (PC, 1.8GHz, 512MB, 160GB ATA, Lin2.6, Reiser) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
REQ: benchmark help | H.W. Stockman | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | April 12th 04 07:07 PM |
IS THIS CORRECT??? ASUS A7N8X Deluxe + benchmark with AIDA32 | Shogun | Asus Motherboards | 35 | December 21st 03 03:26 PM |
Athlon 64 Vs. Pentium 4 article: On the Justification for Quake3 as a CPU Benchmark | rms | Overclocking AMD Processors | 7 | October 5th 03 10:05 PM |
Best bang for buck CPU? | Shawk | Homebuilt PC's | 9 | October 5th 03 07:24 PM |
Athlon 64 Vs. Pentium 4 article: On the Justification for Quake3 as a CPU Benchmark | rms | Overclocking | 6 | October 2nd 03 05:16 PM |