If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Overclocking: Leave voltage as is?
I'm running a 3500+ (90nm) processor on an AN8 ('Fatal1ty')
motherboard, and I've overclocked it from 2.2 to 2.5 GHz. However, the voltage remains at 1.4 despite having multiple options in BIOS. Should I up the voltage? If so, how much? Could I be damaging the processor by leaving the voltage as is? I've not encountered any problems, but it does seem as though it would require more juice. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The only reason you'll need to up the voltage is if things get unstable.
The trade-off is that you get more stability with more voltage, but you also get higher temperatures, which can cause instabilities if your system isn't cooled correctly. 1.4V the core voltage seems low, but I'm not an expert. I'm running my XP-M 2500+ @ 1.8V. As fast as I know, AMD Athlon XP chips run at 1.65V, and the XP-M chips run @ 1.45V by default... but if you can run @ 1.4V, all the power to you! JB aether wrote: I'm running a 3500+ (90nm) processor on an AN8 ('Fatal1ty') motherboard, and I've overclocked it from 2.2 to 2.5 GHz. However, the voltage remains at 1.4 despite having multiple options in BIOS. Should I up the voltage? If so, how much? Could I be damaging the processor by leaving the voltage as is? I've not encountered any problems, but it does seem as though it would require more juice. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
It seems to be running steady. The only side effect to increasing the
voltage (I went from 1.4 to 1.5), was a slight increase in temperature. (from around 40c to 47) I'm currently back at 1.4. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
as long as it runs stable, there is absolutely no
need for increasing the voltage. A lower VCore results in a cooler CPU and therefore longer life and maybe even a more silent system. (if you have temperature controlled fans) aether wrote: It seems to be running steady. The only side effect to increasing the voltage (I went from 1.4 to 1.5), was a slight increase in temperature. (from around 40c to 47) I'm currently back at 1.4. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
They're temperature controlled. I'll leave it at 1.4. I am curious,
however, why it is that some with AMD processors, which are not very old, speak of using voltages much higher than 1.4. (from 1.6 to even 1.8) Is this because of the motherboards, extreme overclocking, or both? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thats because they are talking about a Athlon XP.
The standard VCore for this model is 1,65 Volts. Therefore increasing the voltage to 1,8 is not such a huge step. (But even there an upper limit for convntional cooling) I would recommend stress testing your CPU to make sure that everything is running stable. The Ultimate Boot CD is a good tool for doing so. aether wrote: They're temperature controlled. I'll leave it at 1.4. I am curious, however, why it is that some with AMD processors, which are not very old, speak of using voltages much higher than 1.4. (from 1.6 to even 1.8) Is this because of the motherboards, extreme overclocking, or both? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are mains surge protectors needed in the UK? | John McGaw | Homebuilt PC's | 177 | July 20th 04 08:19 PM |
Are mains surge protectors needed in the UK? | Nick | UK Computer Vendors | 129 | July 20th 04 08:19 PM |
Overclocking issues with p4c800-e dlx | ftran999 | Asus Motherboards | 4 | July 14th 04 09:56 PM |
Intel Active Monitor Voltage Warning | Russell Proulx | Intel | 4 | April 13th 04 12:44 AM |
CPU Core Voltage Too Low -> Crash? | Edward J. Neth | Gateway Computers | 27 | February 22nd 04 04:38 AM |