3dMark 03 score

Hi,

I get a score of 1658 with 3d Mark 03.

My configuration is as follows:

Althon 2000xp
256 mb ddr 2100
256 mb ddr 2700
geforce ti4600 128 (4xAGP)


is this about right?

does it seem a little to slow to anyone?

Seems ok, remember the Geforce 4 Ti cards arent direct x 9 compliant in
hardware, so on a DX9 benchmark like 3dmark03, that hurts you.

I'm using an overclocked 1900XP (192 fsb x 9) and a 4200(325/650), and
I get close to 2000 with drivers 44.03's. If your not overclocking then I think
your score is fine. The 192 fsb helps raise the score a bit from the increase
in memory speed, compared to the memory your using.

"00steve" wrote in message
om...
Hi,

I get a score of 1658 with 3d Mark 03.

My configuration is as follows:

Althon 2000xp
256 mb ddr 2100
256 mb ddr 2700
geforce ti4600 128 (4xAGP)


is this about right?

does it seem a little to slow to anyone?
--------------------------------------------------------
I have a athlonXp2000 with 512mb ddr ram and a geforce4 ti4200 64mb 4xagp
card.
I have o/c the cpu and video card slightly and on 3dmark03 i get about
1450-1490 score.
Yours sounds about right.

Hmm... do you judge your rig on some 'for industry bragging rights' test? Or
are you a 'fanboy'? If your gonna test with a G4 at least use 3dmark2001...
dont go by benchmarks, play CS and start throwing smoke if your fps drops
your rig sux, if it dosent great, lag everyone else, kill them, and when
they start bitching at you, tell them to get a job and buy a better rig.
Those that dont bitch are hacking and cant see the smoke anywayz :P course
you gotta turn off your smoke hack first thou for this test.


"Athura" wrote in message
...
Seems ok, remember the Geforce 4 Ti cards arent direct x 9 compliant in
hardware, so on a DX9 benchmark like 3dmark03, that hurts you.

Yeah, throwing smoke grenades to see if your rig slows down. Real
professional benchmark there. At least give some numbers to compare with.
Even if the test is skewed, if everyone is using it, then it's irellevant.


"llamaboiz" wrote in message
...
Hmm... do you judge your rig on some 'for industry bragging rights' test?
Or
are you a 'fanboy'? If your gonna test with a G4 at least use
3dmark2001...
dont go by benchmarks, play CS and start throwing smoke if your fps drops
your rig sux, if it dosent great, lag everyone else, kill them, and when
they start bitching at you, tell them to get a job and buy a better rig.

Those that dont bitch are hacking and cant see the smoke anywayz :P course
you gotta turn off your smoke hack first thou for this test.


"Athura" wrote in message
...
Seems ok, remember the Geforce 4 Ti cards arent direct x 9 compliant in
hardware, so on a DX9 benchmark like 3dmark03, that hurts you.

I get a score of 1658 with 3d Mark 03.
My configuration is as follows:
Althon 2000xp
256 mb ddr 2100
256 mb ddr 2700
geforce ti4600 128 (4xAGP)
I have a athlonXp2000 with 512mb ddr ram and a geforce4 ti4200 64mb 4xagp
card.
I have o/c the cpu and video card slightly and on 3dmark03 i get about
1450-1490 score.

1643 with Ti4200 XP2600


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 06/11/2003

On 19 Nov 2003 18:43:15 -0800, (00steve) wrote:

Hi,

I get a score of 1658 with 3d Mark 03.

My configuration is as follows:

Althon 2000xp
256 mb ddr 2100
256 mb ddr 2700
geforce ti4600 128 (4xAGP)


is this about right?

does it seem a little to slow to anyone?

yeah its slow... as to be expected when yo throw DX9 code at DX8
cards. Just like the GF2 and GF4-mx (really GF2 cards) trying to RUN
on 3DMark2001.

I get about 1400 on my 4200 with AMD XP2500.

On my spanking new ATI9800Pro, 5200.... And Windows98 is NOT helping.
It was kinda given to me be accident - but so far, while I see the
extra FPS in current games - I wouldn't have bought it to replace my
TI4200 yet.

PS: FX-5900 on an AMD3000 = about 5220.


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!

Yea, but that used to be a good way of seeing if you have a good card or
not. Smoke grenades were nicknamed "Lag" grenades because everyones fps
would drop dramatically when looking at the smoke and their lag times would
spike sky high. I should remember because I used to get that on my TNT2/M64
when that was around. My fps would be a solid 30 then someone would throw
one of those and I would see my fps drop to around 5.

--
Robert Pendell


"Roach" wrote in message
...
Yeah, throwing smoke grenades to see if your rig slows down. Real
professional benchmark there. At least give some numbers to compare with.
Even if the test is skewed, if everyone is using it, then it's irellevant.


"llamaboiz" wrote in message
...
Hmm... do you judge your rig on some 'for industry bragging rights'
test?
Or
are you a 'fanboy'? If your gonna test with a G4 at least use
3dmark2001...
dont go by benchmarks, play CS and start throwing smoke if your fps
drops
your rig sux, if it dosent great, lag everyone else, kill them, and when
they start bitching at you, tell them to get a job and buy a better rig.

Those that dont bitch are hacking and cant see the smoke anywayz :P
course
you gotta turn off your smoke hack first thou for this test.


"Athura" wrote in message
...
Seems ok, remember the Geforce 4 Ti cards arent direct x 9 compliant
in
hardware, so on a DX9 benchmark like 3dmark03, that hurts you.