A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS andFAT drives/partitions?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old December 13th 09, 08:04 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Ed Light
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 924
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?


Rod Speed wrote
There are plenty who cant grasp that defragging most modern systems is pointless.


Note: Rod is filtered out by most group regulars. No need to deal with
his nonsense.
--
Ed Light

Better World News TV Channel:
http://realnews.com

Iraq Veterans Against the War and Related:
http://ivaw.org
http://couragetoresist.org
http://antiwar.com

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.
  #13  
Old December 14th 09, 05:15 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Don Lope de Aguirre
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
Bet they wouldnt be able to pick it in a double blind trial.


The one person on the web forum said they actually measured the difference
before and after defrag so kind of hard to argue with that claim unless they
were lying.

  #14  
Old December 14th 09, 07:48 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Rod Speed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,559
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?

Don Lope de Aguirre wrote
Rod Speed wrote


Bet they wouldnt be able to pick it in a double blind trial.


The one person on the web forum said they actually measured the
difference before and after defrag so kind of hard to argue with that
claim unless they were lying.


Nope, the other fundamental question is whether the measured
difference is noticeable. If it isnt, its not worth worrying about.


  #15  
Old December 14th 09, 12:29 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
David Brown[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?

Don Lope de Aguirre wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
There is no point in furiously defragging anymore.


How about defragging once a month at least? If it is now useless then
why does both Vista and Win7 have tasks auto set to defrag once per
week? It seems that Microsoft disagrees with you.


"Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the
Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in
Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful
in general, or useful on a regular basis.

There are occasional situations where defragging on windows is a good
idea, and it can therefore be useful to have a defragger around. But it
only makes sense to use it when you really need it (for example, to
compact a file system before shrinking a disk partition).

Other operating systems (Macs, Linux, BSD, AIX, Solaris, various other
*nixes, etc.) either don't have any file system defragmentation tools at
all, or provide them only for occasional usage. Given that writing a
defragmenter is not that hard (especially when the file system provides
appropriate support), the obvious conclusion is that there is no good
technical reason for defragmenting in general use of these systems.

With Windows, the file systems suffer more from fragmentation due to
Windows stunningly bad allocation algorithms, but even there
fragmentation is not typically a problem.
  #16  
Old December 14th 09, 05:48 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Cronos
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?

David Brown wrote:

"Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the
Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in
Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful
in general, or useful on a regular basis.


But Microsoft is not Kermit the frog and have many very smart people
working for them so I think it might be prudent to give them some
credibility instead of discounting them without understanding why they
have it set to auto defrag once per week. My guess is they do that
because to do it once a week means it is far quicker to keep the HDDs
defragged than doing it once every few months.
  #17  
Old December 14th 09, 05:50 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Cronos
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?

Rod Speed wrote:


Nope, the other fundamental question is whether the measured
difference is noticeable. If it isnt, its not worth worrying about.



Whether you notice or not is beside the point because the benefit is
there and is measurable regardless of if you notice it or not. I can't
tell if my game is running at 24fps or 30fps but knowing it is running
at 30fps is preferable.
  #18  
Old December 14th 09, 06:44 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Rod Speed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,559
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?

Cronos wrote
Rod Speed wrote


Nope, the other fundamental question is whether the measured
difference is noticeable. If it isnt, its not worth worrying about.


Whether you notice or not is beside the point


Like hell if is. If you cant see any difference, there isnt any point in defragging.

because the benefit is there and is measurable regardless of if you notice it or not.


Mindlessly silly.

I can't tell if my game is running at 24fps or 30fps but knowing it is running at 30fps is preferable.


Even sillier.


  #19  
Old December 14th 09, 10:19 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Jerry Peters
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?

David Brown wrote:
Don Lope de Aguirre wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
There is no point in furiously defragging anymore.


How about defragging once a month at least? If it is now useless then
why does both Vista and Win7 have tasks auto set to defrag once per
week? It seems that Microsoft disagrees with you.


"Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the
Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in
Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful
in general, or useful on a regular basis.


They seem to have taken over from IBM in this regard. IBM's defaults
were very often the least usable alternative. MS's seem to be the most
annoying alternative.

Jerry
  #20  
Old December 14th 09, 10:21 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Jerry Peters
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?

Cronos wrote:
David Brown wrote:

"Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the
Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in
Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful
in general, or useful on a regular basis.


But Microsoft is not Kermit the frog and have many very smart people
working for them so I think it might be prudent to give them some
credibility instead of discounting them without understanding why they
have it set to auto defrag once per week. My guess is they do that
because to do it once a week means it is far quicker to keep the HDDs
defragged than doing it once every few months.


Smart people? You certainly wouldn't know it looking at Windows.

Sorry, but appeals to authority will only get you so far. Evidence
would be a lot better.

Jerry
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions? DevilsPGD[_3_] Storage (alternative) 1 November 26th 09 04:13 AM
can windows 2000 read XP ntfs partitions? Ian R Storage (alternative) 5 June 22nd 07 07:00 AM
copying windows (ntfs) partitions with dd [email protected] Storage & Hardrives 5 May 7th 05 04:46 PM
Can Ghost create NTFS partitions on the fly while restoring NTFS images? Jack Storage (alternative) 8 November 8th 04 11:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.