If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?
Rod Speed wrote There are plenty who cant grasp that defragging most modern systems is pointless. Note: Rod is filtered out by most group regulars. No need to deal with his nonsense. -- Ed Light Better World News TV Channel: http://realnews.com Iraq Veterans Against the War and Related: http://ivaw.org http://couragetoresist.org http://antiwar.com Send spam to the FTC at Thanks, robots. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
... Bet they wouldnt be able to pick it in a double blind trial. The one person on the web forum said they actually measured the difference before and after defrag so kind of hard to argue with that claim unless they were lying. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?
Don Lope de Aguirre wrote
Rod Speed wrote Bet they wouldnt be able to pick it in a double blind trial. The one person on the web forum said they actually measured the difference before and after defrag so kind of hard to argue with that claim unless they were lying. Nope, the other fundamental question is whether the measured difference is noticeable. If it isnt, its not worth worrying about. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?
Don Lope de Aguirre wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message ... There is no point in furiously defragging anymore. How about defragging once a month at least? If it is now useless then why does both Vista and Win7 have tasks auto set to defrag once per week? It seems that Microsoft disagrees with you. "Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful in general, or useful on a regular basis. There are occasional situations where defragging on windows is a good idea, and it can therefore be useful to have a defragger around. But it only makes sense to use it when you really need it (for example, to compact a file system before shrinking a disk partition). Other operating systems (Macs, Linux, BSD, AIX, Solaris, various other *nixes, etc.) either don't have any file system defragmentation tools at all, or provide them only for occasional usage. Given that writing a defragmenter is not that hard (especially when the file system provides appropriate support), the obvious conclusion is that there is no good technical reason for defragmenting in general use of these systems. With Windows, the file systems suffer more from fragmentation due to Windows stunningly bad allocation algorithms, but even there fragmentation is not typically a problem. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?
David Brown wrote:
"Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful in general, or useful on a regular basis. But Microsoft is not Kermit the frog and have many very smart people working for them so I think it might be prudent to give them some credibility instead of discounting them without understanding why they have it set to auto defrag once per week. My guess is they do that because to do it once a week means it is far quicker to keep the HDDs defragged than doing it once every few months. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFSand FAT drives/partitions?
Rod Speed wrote:
Nope, the other fundamental question is whether the measured difference is noticeable. If it isnt, its not worth worrying about. Whether you notice or not is beside the point because the benefit is there and is measurable regardless of if you notice it or not. I can't tell if my game is running at 24fps or 30fps but knowing it is running at 30fps is preferable. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?
Cronos wrote
Rod Speed wrote Nope, the other fundamental question is whether the measured difference is noticeable. If it isnt, its not worth worrying about. Whether you notice or not is beside the point Like hell if is. If you cant see any difference, there isnt any point in defragging. because the benefit is there and is measurable regardless of if you notice it or not. Mindlessly silly. I can't tell if my game is running at 24fps or 30fps but knowing it is running at 30fps is preferable. Even sillier. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?
David Brown wrote:
Don Lope de Aguirre wrote: "Rod Speed" wrote in message ... There is no point in furiously defragging anymore. How about defragging once a month at least? If it is now useless then why does both Vista and Win7 have tasks auto set to defrag once per week? It seems that Microsoft disagrees with you. "Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful in general, or useful on a regular basis. They seem to have taken over from IBM in this regard. IBM's defaults were very often the least usable alternative. MS's seem to be the most annoying alternative. Jerry |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions?
Cronos wrote:
David Brown wrote: "Microsoft disagrees with you" is as good an argument as "Kermit the Frog disagrees with you". There are so many bad choices for defaults in Windows that this is absolutely no indication that defragging is useful in general, or useful on a regular basis. But Microsoft is not Kermit the frog and have many very smart people working for them so I think it might be prudent to give them some credibility instead of discounting them without understanding why they have it set to auto defrag once per week. My guess is they do that because to do it once a week means it is far quicker to keep the HDDs defragged than doing it once every few months. Smart people? You certainly wouldn't know it looking at Windows. Sorry, but appeals to authority will only get you so far. Evidence would be a lot better. Jerry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's the best free disk defragger, not in Windows, for NTFS and FAT drives/partitions? | DevilsPGD[_3_] | Storage (alternative) | 1 | November 26th 09 04:13 AM |
can windows 2000 read XP ntfs partitions? | Ian R | Storage (alternative) | 5 | June 22nd 07 07:00 AM |
copying windows (ntfs) partitions with dd | [email protected] | Storage & Hardrives | 5 | May 7th 05 04:46 PM |
Can Ghost create NTFS partitions on the fly while restoring NTFS images? | Jack | Storage (alternative) | 8 | November 8th 04 11:06 PM |