If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Length of warranty length versus expected lifetime of disks
Re length of warranty versus expected failure rate and disk
life: One or more of Scott Moulton mentions that some lubricant evaporates and is supposed to be recycled inside of the drive. He suspects that not all of the lubricant will be recycled and that therefore the lifetime of the drive is limited. Not specifically stated, but implicit in the comments, are that there are other factors that may lead to end of life of the disk, such as bearing life for the motor and other moving parts. (What we [not working for the disk manufacturers] don't know is if the life of the motors is 5 years and the life of the lubricant is 50 years or the other way around.) My additional take on things is that things eventually get balanced. Thus, with a 3 years from date of manufacture warranty the life of the lubricant and the motors will both tend to 3 years from date of manufacture rather than the old 5 years spinning life. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Length of warranty length versus expected lifetime of disks
Mark F wrote:
Re length of warranty versus expected failure rate and disk life: One or more of Scott Moulton mentions that some lubricant evaporates and is supposed to be recycled inside of the drive. He suspects that not all of the lubricant will be recycled and that therefore the lifetime of the drive is limited. Not specifically stated, but implicit in the comments, are that there are other factors that may lead to end of life of the disk, such as bearing life for the motor and other moving parts. (What we [not working for the disk manufacturers] don't know is if the life of the motors is 5 years and the life of the lubricant is 50 years or the other way around.) My additional take on things is that things eventually get balanced. Thus, with a 3 years from date of manufacture warranty the life of the lubricant and the motors will both tend to 3 years from date of manufacture rather than the old 5 years spinning life. An FDB motor is frictionless, once it starts to work. The constantly pumped fluid, which travels over the bearing surface, is what helps to make it frictionless. But during startup (just like your car), there could be a little bit of friction. There is an attestation, to how good a fluid bearing can be, here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing "According to the ASME (see reference link), the first Michell/Kingsbury fluid bearing in the USA was installed in the Holtwood Hydroelectric Power Plant (on the Susquehanna River, near Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA) in 1912. The 2.25-tonne bearing supports a water turbine and electric generator with a rotating mass of about 165 tonnes and water turbine pressure adding another 40 tonnes. The bearing has been in nearly continuous service since 1912, with no parts replaced. The ASME reported it was still in service as of 2000. As of 2002, the manufacturer estimated the bearings at Holtwood should have a maintenance-free life of about 1,300 years." You can see a sample of a test report for FDB motors here. See figure 3. http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/whit...otor_tp574.pdf They measure how well things are going, by doing a "weight change" test. If the lubricant is leaving the sealed FDB motor, that is an indication that eventually, it will fail due to no lubricant being present. Presumably, operating temperature is an element to lubricant loss. The lubricant is inside the motor itself. It isn't floating around within the HDA. The quantity of lubricant is pretty small. What the test results don't show, is what percentage of FDB motors leaving the factory, are defect free. Obviously, motors and bearing are still failing, but that may not be due solely to the nature of the design. When a disk drive sells for $40 retail, how carefully are all the parts going to be made ? I would hope, that a real reliability calculation, is based on field return data, and takes into account, what percentage of "failure to function" is caused by the motor, head assembly, landing ramp, controller board, and so on. One of those Mickey Mouse theoretical calculations would not make sense, when the manufacturer is determining how much money to set aside for warranty claims. By using real field data (collected as drives come back under warranty), the manufacturer gets a real good idea, what part of their design sucks. They're not going to put that number in print. Instead, the spec section of the web site, will contain the Mickey Mouse calculation (as someone who has played that game, both supplier and customer use the Mickey Mouse method, each with a smirk on their face - the truth may be arrived at by negotiation between the parties, in cases involving large contracts). In the study done here, it was noted that disk drives do not follow the normal "bathtub curve" that people assume. In fact, replacement rate steadily increases with time. So the statistic is not what you'd expect. http://www.siliconsystems.com/techno...re_Studies.pdf One of my expectations would be, that the manufacturer relies on some percentage of customers *not* exercising the warranty, in the same way as a rebate coupon program relies on only a small percentage of customers bothering to correctly fill out the paperwork. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Length of warranty length versus expected lifetime of disks
Mark F wrote:
Re length of warranty versus expected failure rate and disk life: I have no idea about your post but FWIW you can often double the warranty period simply by paying with a credit card. Many (most?) credit card issuers toss that in as an added feature and it can be handy...I've collected at least twice on hard drives that died shortly after the stated warranty period expired. dadiOH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Length of warranty length versus expected lifetime of disks
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:14:43 -0400, Paul wrote:
Mark F wrote: Re length of warranty versus expected failure rate and disk life: One or more of Scott Moulton mentions that some lubricant evaporates and is supposed to be recycled inside of the drive. He suspects that not all of the lubricant will be recycled and that therefore the lifetime of the drive is limited. Not specifically stated, but implicit in the comments, are that there are other factors that may lead to end of life of the disk, such as bearing life for the motor and other moving parts. (What we [not working for the disk manufacturers] don't know is if the life of the motors is 5 years and the life of the lubricant is 50 years or the other way around.) My additional take on things is that things eventually get balanced. Thus, with a 3 years from date of manufacture warranty the life of the lubricant and the motors will both tend to 3 years from date of manufacture rather than the old 5 years spinning life. An FDB motor is frictionless, once it starts to work. The constantly pumped fluid, which travels over the bearing surface, is what helps to make it frictionless. But during startup (just like your car), there could be a little bit of friction. The lubricant that I was referring to was for the surface of the disks, not for the motors. I just mentioned the motors as one of the other items in disk drives that were subject to wearing and that I expected would over time be changed to have a lifetime reduced to that of the least long-lived component. (rest of post valid, but deleted) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Length of warranty length versus expected lifetime of disks
Mark F wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:14:43 -0400, Paul wrote: Mark F wrote: Re length of warranty versus expected failure rate and disk life: One or more of Scott Moulton mentions that some lubricant evaporates and is supposed to be recycled inside of the drive. He suspects that not all of the lubricant will be recycled and that therefore the lifetime of the drive is limited. Not specifically stated, but implicit in the comments, are that there are other factors that may lead to end of life of the disk, such as bearing life for the motor and other moving parts. (What we [not working for the disk manufacturers] don't know is if the life of the motors is 5 years and the life of the lubricant is 50 years or the other way around.) My additional take on things is that things eventually get balanced. Thus, with a 3 years from date of manufacture warranty the life of the lubricant and the motors will both tend to 3 years from date of manufacture rather than the old 5 years spinning life. An FDB motor is frictionless, once it starts to work. The constantly pumped fluid, which travels over the bearing surface, is what helps to make it frictionless. But during startup (just like your car), there could be a little bit of friction. The lubricant that I was referring to was for the surface of the disks, not for the motors. I just mentioned the motors as one of the other items in disk drives that were subject to wearing and that I expected would over time be changed to have a lifetime reduced to that of the least long-lived component. (rest of post valid, but deleted) Info on platter lubrication, here. Picture of platter stackup. http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/resear.../im/index.html Z-DPA mentioned here. http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/resear...gradation.html More details on Z-DPA. Lubricant is very thin (order of one nanometer), and consists of a bonded part and a mobile part. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2005/0282045.html Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Length of warranty length versus expected lifetime of disks
Mark, It seems that you're in the market for HD's. If this is the case,
you need look no farther that the reliability records of the various brands. Quantum, the best of the bunch for both SCSI and IDE has, sadly, been absorbed by a less quality-minded concern. I've had two Q drives for 12-13 years and they run flawlessly. Luck. Please report your findings here. Mark F wrote: Re length of warranty versus expected failure rate and disk life: One or more of Scott Moulton mentions that some lubricant evaporates and is supposed to be recycled inside of the drive. He suspects that not all of the lubricant will be recycled and that therefore the lifetime of the drive is limited. Not specifically stated, but implicit in the comments, are that there are other factors that may lead to end of life of the disk, such as bearing life for the motor and other moving parts. (What we [not working for the disk manufacturers] don't know is if the life of the motors is 5 years and the life of the lubricant is 50 years or the other way around.) My additional take on things is that things eventually get balanced. Thus, with a 3 years from date of manufacture warranty the life of the lubricant and the motors will both tend to 3 years from date of manufacture rather than the old 5 years spinning life. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
usb cable length | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | July 31st 08 02:57 PM |
Warranty Length when Dell purchased at Walmart | Adman | Dell Computers | 10 | December 11th 07 02:47 AM |
Whats the warranty length on Hitachi T7K250 SATAII? | Ian R | Storage (alternative) | 13 | September 13th 06 10:14 AM |
Warranty Length Not Related To Drive Life? | Ron Reaugh | Storage & Hardrives | 41 | August 17th 04 11:44 AM |
Warranty Length Not Related To Drive Life? | Ron Reaugh | Storage (alternative) | 41 | August 17th 04 11:44 AM |