A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Motherboards » Asus Motherboards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

P1-P55T2P4 L2-cache - memory upgrad question?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 4th 04, 12:40 PM
viktor weisshaeupl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default P1-P55T2P4 L2-cache - memory upgrad question?

On a P1-P55T2P4 Rev 3 with a Pentium 166 MHz and 64 MB RAM I wanted
installed another 64 MB which I saved from being thrown away. The board has
a TAG-RAM socket empty and no Pipelined Burst Level 2 Cache Expansion Slot
socket installed. I took an old TAG-RAM from another Pentium board,
installed into the TAG-RAM socket. JP4 cacheable size on Postion 512 MB.
When in position 64MB - system becomes unstable.
There are chips installed in the position called 256/512 onboard L2 cache in
the manual. L2 cache enabled in BIOS.

Problems:
1. I could not find any improvement in speed under Win98SE just by the feel,
no checks run. I had another GIGABYTE 586HX... years ago, the upgrade in
memory and adding the TAG-RAM improved performance speed drastically.
2. When checking with CPUID - there was no L2 cache detected whatsoever.

Any idea what can be wrong?

Viktor Weisshäupl
if personal email, please to weisshaeupl at uta dot at
address in posting exists, but is never read and only meant as a spam
container



  #2  
Old June 4th 04, 04:14 PM
Stephan Grossklass
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

viktor weisshaeupl schrieb:

On a P1-P55T2P4 Rev 3 with a Pentium 166 MHz and 64 MB RAM I wanted
installed another 64 MB which I saved from being thrown away. The board has
a TAG-RAM socket empty and no Pipelined Burst Level 2 Cache Expansion Slot
socket installed. I took an old TAG-RAM from another Pentium board,
installed into the TAG-RAM socket. JP4 cacheable size on Postion 512 MB.
When in position 64MB - system becomes unstable.
There are chips installed in the position called 256/512 onboard L2 cache in
the manual. L2 cache enabled in BIOS.

Problems:
1. I could not find any improvement in speed under Win98SE just by the feel,
no checks run. I had another GIGABYTE 586HX... years ago, the upgrade in
memory and adding the TAG-RAM improved performance speed drastically.
2. When checking with CPUID - there was no L2 cache detected whatsoever.

Any idea what can be wrong?


I'd run ctcm (not the Creative tool, the c't cache/memory benchmark) and
see what that says in terms of cacheable area.

Stephan
--
Meine Andere Seite: http://stephan.win31.de/
PC#6: i440BX, 1xP3-500E, 512 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W
This is a SCSI-inside, Legacy-plus, TCPA-free computer
Mail to From: not read, see homepg. | Real gelesene Mailadr. s. Homep.
  #3  
Old June 4th 04, 06:42 PM
Alni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bonjour,

viktor weisshaeupl a écrit :

On a P1-P55T2P4 Rev 3 with a Pentium 166 MHz and 64 MB RAM I wanted
installed another 64 MB which I saved from being thrown away. The
board has a TAG-RAM socket empty and no Pipelined Burst Level 2 Cache
Expansion Slot socket installed. I took an old TAG-RAM from another
Pentium board, installed into the TAG-RAM socket. JP4 cacheable size
on Postion 512 MB. When in position 64MB - system becomes unstable.
There are chips installed in the position called 256/512 onboard L2
cache in the manual. L2 cache enabled in BIOS.


Have you checked here :
http://www.jump.net/~lcs/kalle/rev3.htm#TAG

I remember that I had upgraded my T2P4 rev 3 to 128Mb some years ago
simply by adding a single "standard 32K X 8 15ns Static RAM" bought in a
"radio-shake" like for 2-3$ and put it in the right socket to get all
the system analysers reports more than 64Mo cachable (don't remember
exactly, may be 512Mo).
By the way all the benchmarks were reflecting correctly wether or not I
use that additionnal TagRam.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Memory question charleh Homebuilt PC's 2 January 12th 05 06:29 PM
Faster Memory Question agh Overclocking 2 June 11th 04 11:03 PM
Memory Timing Question??? Rich, PLS Asus Motherboards 1 January 22nd 04 05:07 AM
question about virtual memory takashi General 2 August 18th 03 12:37 PM
Memory Question DocMilligan Overclocking AMD Processors 1 July 26th 03 11:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.