If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
sharing HBAs between disk and tape
Can a single fibrechannel HBA be shared between disk and tape?
This is for a Windows 2000 fileserver that has an HBA for SAN disk but will now run backup and/or HSM to fibrechannel drives that are also SAN-attached. If the HBA can be shared can it support simultaneous access to more than one tape drive? Backup/HSM software is not decided yet, Veritas, Tivoli, or ??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
yes you can share it. and as for backup software I use veritas netbackup.
(but under solaris). It's a good product but could be better, specially in the schedule area. Keith Michaels wrote in message ... Can a single fibrechannel HBA be shared between disk and tape? This is for a Windows 2000 fileserver that has an HBA for SAN disk but will now run backup and/or HSM to fibrechannel drives that are also SAN-attached. If the HBA can be shared can it support simultaneous access to more than one tape drive? Backup/HSM software is not decided yet, Veritas, Tivoli, or ??? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Boll Weevil ruminated:
Yes, you can share the HBA with disk and tape but it is not recommended. Disk does random read/rights while tape does streaming reads/writes. If your server gets high I/O like in a production invironment, your backups will eventually have problems. The disk traffic will interrupt the backup traffic and will either cause shoe-shining and eventual backup failures. Modern tape drives have fairly sizable buffers. The bigger problem will be whether you exceed the bandwidth limits of the bus, in which case your scenario plays out. But if the HBA has enough bandwidth to handle both the disk storage and the tape drive (i.e., typical small server environment), it's not an issue. When writing DDS4 tapes (which are quite slow, app. 3mb/sec max bus bandwidth), I never ran into problems with disk contention (granted, disk was a single 7800rpm Barracuda 18gb hard drive, tells you how many years ago that was, eh?). Granted, this was with Linux, which used a simple FIFO for issuing SCSI commands... in fact, on Linux, tape I/O was more likely to cause contention problems than disk I/O, because tape I/O was typically done in bigger chunks (32K or more). A bigger problem is if your tape drive doesn't have a high speed SCSI interface, in which case it'll slow down the entire bus to the speed of the tape drive's bus. This is not to say that a fully packed server with a high speed SCSI RAID can be set up like this. Obviously you *will* end up with contention problems in that case, because a high speed SCSI RAID subsystem can swamp the SCSI bus under extreme load. But it's all a matter of bandwidth and OS design. I'm sure that if you design your OS really shoddily (like some so-called "professionally designed" commercial OS's) you can make it so that tape doesn't work right when you have it on the same bus as disk. But (shrug) I don't spend much time worrying about defective operating systems (I use Linux and FreeBSD). Also, if you ever want to do server-less backups, you must have a second HBA. Why? Please explain. -- Eric Lee Green Linux/Unix Software Engineer seeks employment see http://badtux.org for resume -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
years ago that was, eh?). Granted, this was with Linux, which used a simple
FIFO for issuing SCSI commands... Windows too. If the LUN does not support tagged queue - then the requests for it are in the single queue indexed by the block number. Tape I/O is also zero-copy in Windows, and so is disk file IO if the file is opened as noncached. Max |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implementing a RAID System | Chris Guimbellot | General | 33 | February 3rd 05 09:43 AM |
Windows XP won't boot with Tandberg SLR7 tape drive | Andrew Wasielewski | Gigabyte Motherboards | 3 | February 6th 04 01:21 AM |
Vendor Warning! Monarch Computer - Samsung SP1614N 160gb hard disk drives | Steve Hawkins Jr | General | 2 | October 25th 03 03:43 AM |
LiteOn 40x12x48 cdr and win xp - disk spins and spins but don't burn | Winey | Cdr | 0 | August 18th 03 07:56 AM |
DAT tape streamer | John McGaw | General | 0 | July 15th 03 10:04 PM |