|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 22nd 04, 10:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
The 680xx was better than the Pentium
I think our computers would be much better if 68K CPUs were used
instead of Intel Penti-bug CPUs. Motorola CPUs always were MUCH better ! 
|
|
#2
February 22nd 04, 01:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ralf Dieholt wrote:
I think our computers would be much better if 68K CPUs were used instead of Intel Penti-bug CPUs. Motorola CPUs always were MUCH better ! so was beta instead of VHS. So was DDT. So was penicillin over the newer sulfer drugs. So was Coke 30 years ago in glass bottles. You must be overlooking you could buy a Macintosh if you hate x86. Steve
|
|
#3
February 22nd 04, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Motorola CPUs always were MUCH better !
the i432 was MUCH better than the IA64 
|
|
#4
February 23rd 04, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 02:53:48 -0800, Ralf Dieholt wrote:
I think our computers would be much better if 68K CPUs were used instead of Intel Penti-bug CPUs. Motorola CPUs always were MUCH better ! BigZ: Sure, the 68xxx were better. But INTEL was the Gov'mnts chosen CPU manufacture to mate with Windozz, the Feds own backdoored OS. I betcha ....
|
|
#5
February 23rd 04, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 07:28:42 -0600, steve harris wrote:
Ralf Dieholt wrote: I think our computers would be much better if 68K CPUs were used instead of Intel Penti-bug CPUs. Motorola CPUs always were MUCH better ! so was beta instead of VHS. So was DDT. So was penicillin over the newer sulfer drugs. So was Coke 30 years ago in glass bottles. You must be overlooking you could buy a Macintosh if you hate x86. Steve BigS: Er ... I think the Germans invented Sulfa_drugs just after 1900. Penicillin was discovered ... 1935ish, but not produced till 1942(?).
|
|
#6
February 23rd 04, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ray hartman wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 07:28:42 -0600, steve harris wrote: Ralf Dieholt wrote: I think our computers would be much better if 68K CPUs were used instead of Intel Penti-bug CPUs. Motorola CPUs always were MUCH better ! so was beta instead of VHS. So was DDT. So was penicillin over the newer sulfer drugs. So was Coke 30 years ago in glass bottles. You must be overlooking you could buy a Macintosh if you hate x86. Steve BigS: Er ... I think the Germans invented Sulfa_drugs just after 1900. Penicillin was discovered ... 1935ish, but not produced till 1942(?). lol Yeah, I missed that one.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diff between low voltage pentium M and pentium M | Sam Yang | General Hardware | 0 | June 5th 04 09:07 PM |
| Pentium 2 512 MB limitation ? | Peter Perlsų | Intel | 4 | December 24th 03 05:21 AM |
| Intel Updates Plans Again: Adds Pentium 4 EE at 3.40GHz and Pentium 4 at 3.40GHz | lyon_wonder | General | 2 | November 10th 03 11:17 PM |
| Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | General | 14 | July 18th 03 02:11 PM |
| Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | July 13th 03 12:55 PM |
Linear Mode
