If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best printers for photo printing on "plain paper"? (or maybe you've got some better ideas altoghether)
I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color
endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I note that you mentioned inkjets but it may be worthwhile looking at a colour
laser. Many of them print excellent photographs on plain paper and the cost per print is much lower than an inkjet. HP and OKI make very good colour lasers, I'm sure that others do also but I have more experience with these vendors. OKI have flat paper path models which are competitively priced and have low cost of ownership. I have a customer who replaced an inkjet with a colour laser and whose printing costs have reduced by 60%, they print about 100 colour photographs per month and maybe 500 pages of text. They did their own cost of ownership analysis including all consumable parts (Drums, toner, fuser and transfer unit) anticipating a 3 year use of the laser, the inkjet they had been sold by the system provider lasted 1 month past warranty (!) because it was printing 600 pages a month and was poorly specified for the workload. If you believe an inkjet is the way to go then perhaps one of the HP Professional models would suit. Many of them have separate printheads and ink cartridges for each colour and they produce excellent results. I suspect that low to mid-range inkjet printers may not be the best in the long run for something as professional as you describe. Tony "JSteele" wrote: I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tony,
Thanks for the response. Your advice regarding the cost advantages of the color laser vs. the inkjet is compelling, of course. I'll look into what you're suggesting--unfortunately, my client here is notoriously short-term in his finacial thinking. One other question comes to my mind though regarding a color laser unit and that is size. Aren't most of the color laser units fairly large relative to most inkjet systems? I've only got a 24"x17" shelf atop a mobile cart within which to fit a Shuttle mini-pc, a flat panel monitor and a printer, so space could be an issue. Of course, I haven't eyeballed any of the newer laser units of the past two years or so, so perhaps they've come down in size. I'll have to take a gander at the specs on some of the HP and OKI color lasers. Thanks again for taking the time to help me out, Tony. Take care Tony wrote in message news I note that you mentioned inkjets but it may be worthwhile looking at a colour laser. Many of them print excellent photographs on plain paper and the cost per print is much lower than an inkjet. HP and OKI make very good colour lasers, I'm sure that others do also but I have more experience with these vendors. OKI have flat paper path models which are competitively priced and have low cost of ownership. I have a customer who replaced an inkjet with a colour laser and whose printing costs have reduced by 60%, they print about 100 colour photographs per month and maybe 500 pages of text. They did their own cost of ownership analysis including all consumable parts (Drums, toner, fuser and transfer unit) anticipating a 3 year use of the laser, the inkjet they had been sold by the system provider lasted 1 month past warranty (!) because it was printing 600 pages a month and was poorly specified for the workload. If you believe an inkjet is the way to go then perhaps one of the HP Professional models would suit. Many of them have separate printheads and ink cartridges for each colour and they produce excellent results. I suspect that low to mid-range inkjet printers may not be the best in the long run for something as professional as you describe. Tony "JSteele" wrote: I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, you do have a space issue with a colour laser, they are much bigger than
most inkjets. Different makes and models have different profiles but are certainly bigger and heavier. Maybe the HP Professional inkjets are a better fit for the job, they are reasonably sized and may also suit a short term financial view more effectively. Good luck Tony "JSteele" wrote: Tony, Thanks for the response. Your advice regarding the cost advantages of the color laser vs. the inkjet is compelling, of course. I'll look into what you're suggesting--unfortunately, my client here is notoriously short-term in his finacial thinking. One other question comes to my mind though regarding a color laser unit and that is size. Aren't most of the color laser units fairly large relative to most inkjet systems? I've only got a 24"x17" shelf atop a mobile cart within which to fit a Shuttle mini-pc, a flat panel monitor and a printer, so space could be an issue. Of course, I haven't eyeballed any of the newer laser units of the past two years or so, so perhaps they've come down in size. I'll have to take a gander at the specs on some of the HP and OKI color lasers. Thanks again for taking the time to help me out, Tony. Take care Tony wrote in message news I note that you mentioned inkjets but it may be worthwhile looking at a colour laser. Many of them print excellent photographs on plain paper and the cost per print is much lower than an inkjet. HP and OKI make very good colour lasers, I'm sure that others do also but I have more experience with these vendors. OKI have flat paper path models which are competitively priced and have low cost of ownership. I have a customer who replaced an inkjet with a colour laser and whose printing costs have reduced by 60%, they print about 100 colour photographs per month and maybe 500 pages of text. They did their own cost of ownership analysis including all consumable parts (Drums, toner, fuser and transfer unit) anticipating a 3 year use of the laser, the inkjet they had been sold by the system provider lasted 1 month past warranty (!) because it was printing 600 pages a month and was poorly specified for the workload. If you believe an inkjet is the way to go then perhaps one of the HP Professional models would suit. Many of them have separate printheads and ink cartridges for each colour and they produce excellent results. I suspect that low to mid-range inkjet printers may not be the best in the long run for something as professional as you describe. Tony "JSteele" wrote: I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I would recommend a Canon IP5000 using Canon OEM ink and Hammermill
inkjet paper. The ink can be purchased at Costco and the paper is sold at Office Depot and Staples. For better photo quality I would recommend Epson matte paper; either single or double sided. The reverse side can be used for more text and the printer has dual paper feed and duplex printing mode. JSteele wrote: I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hi once more,
You will have seen a post from measekite who recommends the ip5000. This printer has the finest nozzles available on the market (I think) and this technology (1pcl) is yet to be proven, in my business I have seen several ip5000's go back to the manufacturer under warranty all with print quality problems, on the other hand I have not seen any ip4000's in for warranty repairs and more of them have been sold. I am beginning to wonder if there is a problem with the 1pcl technology, just an observation. The quality of the ip4000 colour prints is very high and I doubt if the ip5000 offers any advantages in the situation you are describing. I speak from actual experience with the reliability of these printers and not from a position of entrenchment. I own an ip4000 and it is a great printer for the home environment. Having said that, I do not think that the Canon PIXMA series is aimed at the professional market, the HP Business Inkjet series (http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en...51-411179.html) certainly is and I still think the extra cost will buy long term benefit in terms of reliability and much cheaper replacement of the individual print heads if they ever fail. Canon printhead replacement is a costly exercise and many say not worthwhile. HP 11 individual printheads have an anticipated life of 16000 pages approx, I don't think Canon will tell you what their print head life expectancy is. Horses for Courses in my opinion, professional printers for professinal applications! Tony "JSteele" wrote: I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"JSteele" wrote in message ... I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I would suggest looking at the HP DeskJet 6540, see http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en...51-357210.html . There is also a version with built in networking, the 6840. Printing in best mode these will give pretty good photos on plain paper. For best results on both photo and text on the same paper try a coated inkjet paper such as HP Premium Inkjet paper, see http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en...138-16139.html. This is about $0.10/sheet and has a finish like normal paper but is a it thicker and has a special coating to give better results for both text and color printing. Regards, Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP and using some inkjet coated paper such as |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I've only got a 24"x17" shelf atop a mobile cart within
which to fit a Shuttle mini-pc, a flat panel monitor and a printer, so space could be an issue. Most lasers are front feeders. It doesn't have to be on the top. Many if not most offer a straight path i.e. paper in the front output in the rear. I know WiFi isn't popular around medical equipment, but is ethernet an option? Print the the office color copier/laser. The whole business of not considering inkjet paper is well nutty esp considering that many inkjets when printing full color letter sized are bucks/page, were 69lb Kirkland photo paper is 16c a page when bought in a 125p pack. You could say the simple bulk of the paper would cause the folders to explode, but it's costs is peanuts. Imagine a yield 400 pages at 5% for $15 each color or $60. Then imagine 100% is 20pages, at $60. Now imagine an 8 color printer at $120 for 20 pages . Assuming plain paper... The Epson Stylus c86 isn't too bad on your usual paper. Price mark $90 to $100, $20 rebate if you are not lazy. Huge black for text, pigmented DuraBright ink. I think it's like $60 to refill. Extra large black is a nice feature. But after a certain number of copies it has to be serviced for a diaper replacement, will blink won't print. I printed 5 inch circle daily for 6 months before my diaper overflowed. For any sort of serious work, you should pickup an extra just in case it needs to be serviced during it's warranty period, which given 3 copies a daily of text and photo, it likely will. I tend to argue, "Sure we can go with the $100 printer, but we'll shell out hundrads a month for the ink. And we'll have to pickup three, after all they need to be serviced after the 10th refill or so and we don't want down time do we. So we'll cycle two inbetween the shop that's 20 miles away, and when the warranty expires we can use the 3rd till we get another three. Or we can just get a laser, lower our text documents to under a cent a page and our graphics under a buck a page. ". -Cart count I pulled out of the air, don't have any clue how many carts = full diaper. There is also the r800 which is very nice on plain paper, but it costs $400... might as well go laser if you have the room. Both are top feeders IIRC One set of reviews on photo papers for the Epsons http://members.cox.net/rmeyer9/epson/eastwood.html ----- Someone might recommend the ip5000 as far as consumer grade inkjets go. I have to admit, it's more cart compatible than the older i960 (very nice 6-color printer) which is a top feeder 6 color, but the ip6000 has 6 color (4+2) as well and is the same basic box will fit on the cart shape. I don't know how any of these look on plain paper, I only have an ip3000 and a mp760, and either of those don't look anywhere near photographic quality, and the paper gets wet and warps. ---- HP has some nice options but I haven't shopped for HP in some time. But I gotta agree with Tony on this. Many of the printers in the HP professional class take huge carts, a point as you are printing 3 copies of mixed text/graphics a day. You tend to lose more from downtime then you'd save going with consumer grade and 15ml carts. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tony wrote: Hi once more, You will have seen a post from measekite who recommends the ip5000. This printer has the finest nozzles available on the market (I think) and this technology (1pcl) is yet to be proven, in my business I have seen several ip5000's go back to the manufacturer under warranty all with print quality problems, on the other hand I have not seen any ip4000's in for warranty repairs and more of them have been sold. I am beginning to wonder if there is a problem with the 1pcl technology, just an observation. The quality of the ip4000 colour prints is very high and I doubt if the ip5000 offers any advantages Not for photos but for business documents. in the situation you are describing. I speak from actual experience with the reliability of these printers and not from a position of entrenchment. I own an ip4000 and it is a great printer for the home environment. Having said that, I do not think that the Canon PIXMA series is aimed at the professional market, the HP Business Inkjet series (http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en...51-411179.html) certainly is and I still think the extra cost will buy long term benefit in terms of reliability and much cheaper replacement of the individual print heads if they ever fail. Canon printhead replacement is a costly exercise and many say not worthwhile. HP 11 individual printheads have an anticipated life of 16000 pages approx, I don't think Canon will tell you what their print head life expectancy is. Horses for Courses in my opinion, professional printers for professinal applications! Tony "JSteele" wrote: I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
An argument for the Color Laser might be that of printout durability as well
as dependability. (no nozzle clogging) The basic "footprint" for many of the current lasers is no more than that for some of the larger ink jet/ bubble jet printers. On the other hand , some of the inkjet printers are so cheap with discounts that you can buy a new one for about the same price as the set of replacement ink tanks. IE $99 for a new printer with ink tanks, $59 for a set of ink tanks. (Buy them by the dozen?) "JSteele" wrote in message ... I'm currently putting together a portable video capture system for a color endoscopy camera. The client wants to be able to print good quality (as near as photo quality as reasonably possible) frame captures on paper along with a black text letterhead and some descriptive comments about the respective captures. He wants to be able to print on "plain paper" because, in his view, it's more affordable and he's under the impression that any sort of "photo paper" won't allow him to print quality black text on the same page with video captures. I'm frankly lost. Printers and paper stocks are not my area of expertise, so I'm looking for your help and advice. What would you recommend in the way of low to mid range priced inkjet printers that would fit the bill? Or, perhaps you have a recommendation for a type of paper stock which will meet his needs for both black text and near-photo quality. This printer, btw, would print, on average, only about 80-100 pages per month, so even higher cost inks and paper stock would most likely be acceptable to the client. Would really appreciate help on this issue. I imagine that there's more info some of you might need in order to make a recommendation, so please fire away if you have any other questions. Thank you all very much. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
double-sided printing with laser printers | Wolfgang Jeltsch | Printers | 10 | January 7th 05 08:12 AM |
Matte printing poor, but plain paper OK? Canon S820 | Paul Soderman | Printers | 0 | August 1st 04 05:03 PM |
4x6 printers | Kenneth Oakman | Printers | 8 | February 29th 04 10:37 PM |
Canon i550/850 visible diffs of photo on plain paper | Heli Hickle | Printers | 0 | August 4th 03 10:16 AM |
New Epson pigment ink printers for photo printing? | Mark B. | Printers | 0 | August 1st 03 10:58 AM |