A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » System Manufacturers & Vendors » Gateway Computers
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

710XL RAID Systems



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 19th 04, 07:25 PM
AE1M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 710XL RAID Systems

I am expecting a 710XL Home Office system next week. The system has
two 250GB hard drives for a total of 500GB. It is not clear to me
from the website if they are shipped as one RAID 0 configuration. The
description says RAID 0 performance (?).

My understanding of RAID 0 is that the data is striped across the two
250GB drives. With RAID 0, there is no redundancy. So, if one drive
should fail, I'd loose all data. If it were RAID 1, there would be
redundancy and there would be actually only 250GB usable. Is this
right?

I'd prefer two seperate 250GB ATA drives, read/write speed is not as
important to me as size. Will I have to reformat the system when it
arrives to have this configuration?

Bob
  #2  
Old February 20th 04, 12:10 AM
Edward J. Neth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"AE1M" wrote in message
s.com...
I am expecting a 710XL Home Office system next week. The system has
two 250GB hard drives for a total of 500GB. It is not clear to me
from the website if they are shipped as one RAID 0 configuration. The
description says RAID 0 performance (?).

My understanding of RAID 0 is that the data is striped across the two
250GB drives. With RAID 0, there is no redundancy. So, if one drive
should fail, I'd loose all data. If it were RAID 1, there would be
redundancy and there would be actually only 250GB usable. Is this
right?



Yes, that is correct - RAID 0 effectively doubles the chance of data loss
due to drive failure because the array
depends on two drives.


I'd prefer two seperate 250GB ATA drives, read/write speed is not as
important to me as size. Will I have to reformat the system when it
arrives to have this configuration?


Yes.

The solution is RAID5 (striping with parity) - but that requires three
drives, or RAID0+1 (which mirrors the array to another pair of drives - of
course, that requires four drives. RAID5 is beyond the capability of most
low-cost controllers, and RAID0+1 is impractical from the standpoint that it
requires four drives.

RAID 1 provides redundancy (not backup - redundancy) - though an alternative
would be to use an external USB 2.0 or firewire drive to store an image of
the system disc. That provides the capacity for removeable backup.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help with SATA RAID 1 failure on A7N8X Delux Cameron Asus Motherboards 10 September 6th 04 11:50 PM
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. Julian Asus Motherboards 2 August 11th 04 12:43 PM
How Create SATA RAID 1 with current install? Mr Mister Asus Motherboards 8 July 25th 04 10:46 PM
FYI: RAID 1 Conversion Tim Gigabyte Motherboards 1 February 21st 04 08:56 PM
RAID and non-RAID combination Howard Gigabyte Motherboards 3 October 4th 03 11:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.