If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
710XL RAID Systems
I am expecting a 710XL Home Office system next week. The system has
two 250GB hard drives for a total of 500GB. It is not clear to me from the website if they are shipped as one RAID 0 configuration. The description says RAID 0 performance (?). My understanding of RAID 0 is that the data is striped across the two 250GB drives. With RAID 0, there is no redundancy. So, if one drive should fail, I'd loose all data. If it were RAID 1, there would be redundancy and there would be actually only 250GB usable. Is this right? I'd prefer two seperate 250GB ATA drives, read/write speed is not as important to me as size. Will I have to reformat the system when it arrives to have this configuration? Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"AE1M" wrote in message s.com... I am expecting a 710XL Home Office system next week. The system has two 250GB hard drives for a total of 500GB. It is not clear to me from the website if they are shipped as one RAID 0 configuration. The description says RAID 0 performance (?). My understanding of RAID 0 is that the data is striped across the two 250GB drives. With RAID 0, there is no redundancy. So, if one drive should fail, I'd loose all data. If it were RAID 1, there would be redundancy and there would be actually only 250GB usable. Is this right? Yes, that is correct - RAID 0 effectively doubles the chance of data loss due to drive failure because the array depends on two drives. I'd prefer two seperate 250GB ATA drives, read/write speed is not as important to me as size. Will I have to reformat the system when it arrives to have this configuration? Yes. The solution is RAID5 (striping with parity) - but that requires three drives, or RAID0+1 (which mirrors the array to another pair of drives - of course, that requires four drives. RAID5 is beyond the capability of most low-cost controllers, and RAID0+1 is impractical from the standpoint that it requires four drives. RAID 1 provides redundancy (not backup - redundancy) - though an alternative would be to use an external USB 2.0 or firewire drive to store an image of the system disc. That provides the capacity for removeable backup. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need help with SATA RAID 1 failure on A7N8X Delux | Cameron | Asus Motherboards | 10 | September 6th 04 11:50 PM |
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. | Julian | Asus Motherboards | 2 | August 11th 04 12:43 PM |
How Create SATA RAID 1 with current install? | Mr Mister | Asus Motherboards | 8 | July 25th 04 10:46 PM |
FYI: RAID 1 Conversion | Tim | Gigabyte Motherboards | 1 | February 21st 04 08:56 PM |
RAID and non-RAID combination | Howard | Gigabyte Motherboards | 3 | October 4th 03 11:54 AM |