If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
Hello,
I've been looking for an inexpensive networked storage solution using 4 500 GB SATA hard disks in a 4 bay enclosure that supports raid-5, giving me 1.5 TB of storage. I've perused the following possibilities: StorCenter Pro NAS 150d/2TB from Iomega terastation pro II from Buffalo Technologies SS4000-E from Intel They all seem comparable, but I'm leaning toward the Intel model because I can buy the enclosure separate from the disks. Here's the problem though. All of these seem to be marketed to the Windows market, and I want a solution that will work for Linux/Unix wokstations. I want to set it up and be able to use NFS to mount the disk just like I would mount the exported disk on a linux or unix machine. I'd like to be able to choose (by ip address) which machines are allowed to access the disk, and set up users and groups. These boxes all mention NFS (or DFS - in the case of the tetrastation pro II), but that's the extent of it. I've emailed the various companies for more information, but haven't heard a peep. I assume because these boxes are actually running a linux 2.6 kernel that I can do what I want, but I'd like confirmation before I order. Has anyone actually set one of these systems up and used NFS to mount it as an external disk from a linux or unix workstation? Any opinions on which one would be best? Thanks. -Jonathan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
Buy a generic computer, install 4 drives there and your favourite Linux
distro. Is this bad? -- Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP StorageCraft Corporation http://www.storagecraft.com "JJ" wrote in message ... Hello, I've been looking for an inexpensive networked storage solution using 4 500 GB SATA hard disks in a 4 bay enclosure that supports raid-5, giving me 1.5 TB of storage. I've perused the following possibilities: StorCenter Pro NAS 150d/2TB from Iomega terastation pro II from Buffalo Technologies SS4000-E from Intel They all seem comparable, but I'm leaning toward the Intel model because I can buy the enclosure separate from the disks. Here's the problem though. All of these seem to be marketed to the Windows market, and I want a solution that will work for Linux/Unix wokstations. I want to set it up and be able to use NFS to mount the disk just like I would mount the exported disk on a linux or unix machine. I'd like to be able to choose (by ip address) which machines are allowed to access the disk, and set up users and groups. These boxes all mention NFS (or DFS - in the case of the tetrastation pro II), but that's the extent of it. I've emailed the various companies for more information, but haven't heard a peep. I assume because these boxes are actually running a linux 2.6 kernel that I can do what I want, but I'd like confirmation before I order. Has anyone actually set one of these systems up and used NFS to mount it as an external disk from a linux or unix workstation? Any opinions on which one would be best? Thanks. -Jonathan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:
Buy a generic computer, install 4 drives there and your favourite Linux distro. Is this bad? Thanks for your input, but... .... that will not give me hot-swap capability. Plus it gives me the overhead of worrying about another whole linux system (and my linux sysadmin skills are marginal, I'm much better with Solaris). We actually do have some internal raids like this on some of our linux systems, and they're a pain to deal with if you lose a disk. We also have 12-disk external raid box with hot swap capability hooked up to a Sun and it's so simple to deal with if a single disk goes south. Unfortunately, the size of the disks is small and going the Sun route is prohibitively expensive right now. I started my search by just looking for a raid card and external box with hot-swap capability that I could hook up to one of our existing linux boxes, but again, most of the stuff I found seemed to be geared toward windows. I'm no linux guru, and when faced with installing cards, flashing bios, installing drivers (if they exist), etc, I was a bit daunted. When I heard about a standalone networked solution, it seemed ideal. Also, a lot of the good-looking raid cards were PCIe, and we don't seem to have that type of slot on our linux boxes. Others were so expensive as to be prohibitive. Also, one of my colleagues previously set up a raid in an external box hooked to a linux machine (he was much more profficient than me at linux admin) and it crashed and burned at some point. We never could figure out exactly why, but it was suggested that it was somehow linked with having the raid card and the disks powered by different power supplies. That could be a totally bogus conclusion, but it does make me leary. Anyway. These standalone networked stoarge devices seem a simple and reasonably priced alternative - if they will do what they seem to promise. So if anyone has any input on any of the models mentioned, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. -Jonathan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
How much money can you spend? I have been through a whole lot of
iterations trying to find reliable cheap storage, and this is what we've been doing lately: Get an x86 server class system, such as these: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ You can pretty much build anything from a 500GB to 15TB server in one chassis out of these. Install a decent 3ware RAID card. The newer 3ware cards are actually very good. Then get a DOM (Disk on Module) from these guys (Silicon Mechanics will sell you this as well): http://www.open-e.com The Open-E solution turns your commodity x86 box into a SAN or NAS server, with a simple web interface. They pre-install the 3ware 3dm2 web management interface with their product, so you can monitor drive failures, handle drive replacements, schedule RAID verifies, etc. You can set up the device in about 1/2 hour, and be ready to roll. You should be able to put together a 1.5TB server for a $3-4K pretty easily. BTW: Since you're a Solaris person, we are now running zfs on a 10TB Open-E iSCSI R-3 box, and it absolutely smokes. With a powerful enough x86 Solaris server, you could see near 200MB/sec write speeds with 15 IO streams. Not sure about NFS speeds though. Not a lot of experience with that. But using a Solaris system as the head node, and an iSCSI SAN back side works really well. Jon JJ wrote: div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed"Maxim S. Shatskih wrote: Buy a generic computer, install 4 drives there and your favourite Linux distro. Is this bad? Thanks for your input, but... ... that will not give me hot-swap capability. Plus it gives me the overhead of worrying about another whole linux system (and my linux sysadmin skills are marginal, I'm much better with Solaris). We actually do have some internal raids like this on some of our linux systems, and they're a pain to deal with if you lose a disk. We also have 12-disk external raid box with hot swap capability hooked up to a Sun and it's so simple to deal with if a single disk goes south. Unfortunately, the size of the disks is small and going the Sun route is prohibitively expensive right now. I started my search by just looking for a raid card and external box with hot-swap capability that I could hook up to one of our existing linux boxes, but again, most of the stuff I found seemed to be geared toward windows. I'm no linux guru, and when faced with installing cards, flashing bios, installing drivers (if they exist), etc, I was a bit daunted. When I heard about a standalone networked solution, it seemed ideal. Also, a lot of the good-looking raid cards were PCIe, and we don't seem to have that type of slot on our linux boxes. Others were so expensive as to be prohibitive. Also, one of my colleagues previously set up a raid in an external box hooked to a linux machine (he was much more profficient than me at linux admin) and it crashed and burned at some point. We never could figure out exactly why, but it was suggested that it was somehow linked with having the raid card and the disks powered by different power supplies. That could be a totally bogus conclusion, but it does make me leary. Anyway. These standalone networked stoarge devices seem a simple and reasonably priced alternative - if they will do what they seem to promise. So if anyone has any input on any of the models mentioned, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. -Jonathan /div -- - _____/ _____/ / - Jonathan Loran - - - / / / IT Manager - - _____ / _____ / / Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley - / / / (510) 643-5146 - ______/ ______/ ______/ AST:7731^29u18e3 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
Jonathan,
Thanks for your detailed response. It looks like you've found a nice solution - although it still doesn't seem to give hot-swap functionality. Also, we have all standalone boxes (no rack for rack mounting). If I felt I had more tech savvy, I might go in for this sort of solution. I'm also kind of limited to the 1-1.5K price range. I may end up regretting this choice on the "reliable" front, but I think I'm going to have to try the intel box and see what happens. Thanks again. -Jonathan Jonathan Loran wrote: How much money can you spend? I have been through a whole lot of iterations trying to find reliable cheap storage, and this is what we've been doing lately: Get an x86 server class system, such as these: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ You can pretty much build anything from a 500GB to 15TB server in one chassis out of these. Install a decent 3ware RAID card. The newer 3ware cards are actually very good. Then get a DOM (Disk on Module) from these guys (Silicon Mechanics will sell you this as well): http://www.open-e.com The Open-E solution turns your commodity x86 box into a SAN or NAS server, with a simple web interface. They pre-install the 3ware 3dm2 web management interface with their product, so you can monitor drive failures, handle drive replacements, schedule RAID verifies, etc. You can set up the device in about 1/2 hour, and be ready to roll. You should be able to put together a 1.5TB server for a $3-4K pretty easily. BTW: Since you're a Solaris person, we are now running zfs on a 10TB Open-E iSCSI R-3 box, and it absolutely smokes. With a powerful enough x86 Solaris server, you could see near 200MB/sec write speeds with 15 IO streams. Not sure about NFS speeds though. Not a lot of experience with that. But using a Solaris system as the head node, and an iSCSI SAN back side works really well. Jon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
Jonathan, These are indeed hot swappable. You can buy these chassis with hot swap SATA sleds, and the 3ware cards support auto detection when a drive is changed out. Also, not much need for tech savvy with the Open-E solution. it's quite easy to set them up. However, your price point is very limiting. you are going to be stuck with a consumer product with perhaps some flaky limitations. I'm hoping you'll be lucky though. Post to the list what you end up with, and how it works. Jon JJ wrote: div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed"Jonathan, Thanks for your detailed response. It looks like you've found a nice solution - although it still doesn't seem to give hot-swap functionality. Also, we have all standalone boxes (no rack for rack mounting). If I felt I had more tech savvy, I might go in for this sort of solution. I'm also kind of limited to the 1-1.5K price range. I may end up regretting this choice on the "reliable" front, but I think I'm going to have to try the intel box and see what happens. Thanks again. -Jonathan Jonathan Loran wrote: How much money can you spend? I have been through a whole lot of iterations trying to find reliable cheap storage, and this is what we've been doing lately: Get an x86 server class system, such as these: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ You can pretty much build anything from a 500GB to 15TB server in one chassis out of these. Install a decent 3ware RAID card. The newer 3ware cards are actually very good. Then get a DOM (Disk on Module) from these guys (Silicon Mechanics will sell you this as well): http://www.open-e.com The Open-E solution turns your commodity x86 box into a SAN or NAS server, with a simple web interface. They pre-install the 3ware 3dm2 web management interface with their product, so you can monitor drive failures, handle drive replacements, schedule RAID verifies, etc. You can set up the device in about 1/2 hour, and be ready to roll. You should be able to put together a 1.5TB server for a $3-4K pretty easily. BTW: Since you're a Solaris person, we are now running zfs on a 10TB Open-E iSCSI R-3 box, and it absolutely smokes. With a powerful enough x86 Solaris server, you could see near 200MB/sec write speeds with 15 IO streams. Not sure about NFS speeds though. Not a lot of experience with that. But using a Solaris system as the head node, and an iSCSI SAN back side works really well. Jon /div -- - _____/ _____/ / - Jonathan Loran - - - / / / IT Manager - - _____ / _____ / / Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley - / / / (510) 643-5146 - ______/ ______/ ______/ AST:7731^29u18e3 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Networked raid storage and NFS
JJ wrote: Hello, I've been looking for an inexpensive networked storage solution using 4 500 GB SATA hard disks in a 4 bay enclosure that supports raid-5, giving me 1.5 TB of storage. I've perused the following possibilities: StorCenter Pro NAS 150d/2TB from Iomega terastation pro II from Buffalo Technologies SS4000-E from Intel They all seem comparable, but I'm leaning toward the Intel model because I can buy the enclosure separate from the disks. Here's the problem though. All of these seem to be marketed to the Windows market, and I want a solution that will work for Linux/Unix wokstations. I want to set it up and be able to use NFS to mount the disk just like I would mount the exported disk on a linux or unix machine. I'd like to be able to choose (by ip address) which machines are allowed to access the disk, and set up users and groups. Hi Jonathan, Take a look at the Infrant ReadyNAS NV+ ( http://www.infrant.com/products/prod...dyNAS%20NVPlus ). I don't have this model but I do have a ReadyNAS and it works fine with Linux. The NV+ has hot-swapable drives. My only complaint with the Infrant boxes is that they are slower than I'd like, although this applies to all of them in this price range. Good luck, Steve These boxes all mention NFS (or DFS - in the case of the tetrastation pro II), but that's the extent of it. I've emailed the various companies for more information, but haven't heard a peep. I assume because these boxes are actually running a linux 2.6 kernel that I can do what I want, but I'd like confirmation before I order. Has anyone actually set one of these systems up and used NFS to mount it as an external disk from a linux or unix workstation? Any opinions on which one would be best? Thanks. -Jonathan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Networked Backup Storage Appliance Recommendation? | [email protected] | Storage & Hardrives | 1 | December 8th 05 01:32 PM |
2TB IDE RAID Storage - Build Vs. Buy | Ted Rivera | Storage & Hardrives | 5 | October 13th 04 06:35 PM |
New to RAID-need to add storage HDD | DeaDon | Asus Motherboards | 1 | May 27th 04 06:30 AM |
Storage bottleneck when using RAID 1 ? | [email protected] | Storage & Hardrives | 6 | October 6th 03 08:48 AM |
Networked Storage Solution? | DBS | Storage (alternative) | 1 | June 27th 03 08:12 PM |