A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Advise for intel about integrating RAM onto chip.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10th 20, 04:33 AM posted to alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 533
Default Advise for intel about integrating RAM onto chip.

One more posting though about the "RAM" integration attempt of intel and others onto CPUs/chips.

It seems Intel is trying to be "nice" about it and trying to create an "eco" system for other RAM manufacturers to deliver "RAM" chips for integration on top of the Intel's CPUs.

This tactic/strategy is probably flawed and weak. Bussiness is war, in war help nobody, everybody has to fight for themselfes, effectively.

Nobody will probably join Intel into this effort until it's proven that it will work and even then it is doubtfull. This tactic/strategy is taking too long apperently.

RAM chips may be necessary for other devices or laptop or what not. This may be an unforseen complication with this idea.

Thus I must concluse that this RAM integration onto CHIPS is an ALL-or-NOTHING strategy.

That means Intel will have to pull this off WITHOUT help from RAM manufacturers and they must do it in such a fashion that it involves ALL of their products.

Laptops/PC chips, server chips maybe even mobile phones or surface device and so forth.

Intel MUST be willing to "DESTROY" the RAM companies. It is either DESTROY or be DESTROYED potentially.

Intel stands for "integrated electronics" this is what they do, this is at the hart of their company. In the past Intel integrated CACHE chips into their CPUs.

They could very well do the same with RAM chips. But they must produce these themselfes and integrate them well.

Perhaps RAM companies will then come to intel to strike a deal before they go out of bussiness.

For now basically my conclusion is that CEO and maybe head of intel is too nice and to weak to bite through and make this happens.

Investors may have to call for FIREING of CEO if CEO is not willing to destroy RAM companies.

Intel may be very well in trouble and their future is at stake. It's other Intel destroy RAM companies or they have no good product to survive against the uncoming unslaught of AMD.

And these many-core processors will start to trickle down to laptops as well.

One temporarely solution would be to "clone" and "copy paste" threadripper design/chiplet design and go with that for now, it's proven to work somewhat, it gets hot but is doable.

Until ram on chip is decently integrated and if it's coolable.

In a way AMD seems to have beaten intel to this thanks to chiplet design and HUGE 288 MB cache in total on Threadripper 3 3990x.

I write this message mainly to try and save INTEL from destruction, Intel is needed to keep prices competitive and don't play under one HOOD lol ! =D

Bye for now,
Skybuck.

P.S.: Thoughen up ! =D
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When did Dell start integrating USB 2.0? Vicente Zamora Dell Computers 17 March 12th 06 01:25 PM
intel chip, intel board... but no dice. help? Quartz Homebuilt PC's 23 September 27th 05 10:31 PM
Integrating Peltier cooling directly into chips Yousuf Khan General 2 October 31st 04 09:22 PM
Integrating Peltier cooling directly into chips Yousuf Khan AMD x86-64 Processors 0 October 23rd 04 09:04 PM
3.4 or 3.6 Intel 775 Chip ? andyw General 3 September 17th 04 02:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.