If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Here is a URL for an article that discusses registry changes to create
READ-ONLY removable media. I'm not sure that it is pertinent to the subject of this thread. A larger problem appears to be the FS mount. http://windowsitpro.com/windowsstora...380/44380.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I've heard there is some sort of registry setting or add-in that would
allow you to do a Read-only NTFS mount. Can't get much simpler than XP and later can do this by default without any tuning. w2k and earlier - cannot without a disk filter driver. -- Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP StorageCraft Corporation http://www.storagecraft.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Will" wrote in message ... No, our application is write once every two weeks, but read 10,000 times a day. We don't need to track writes to the disk, and on those days when writes take place, the readers can simply be rebooted. If you are going to manually reboot every time the writer "writes" then you might get away with this approach, anything else is likely to lead the "readers" into random blue screens (well more random than normal :-) as they occasionally get inconsistent data from what they *believe* is a read-only device. Silly question, but why not serve the disks up to the "writer" and share it from so that the readers access via a network share? -- Nik Simpson |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
It's a good question, but it was just my assumption that the network
introduces latency on each operation. When you need to open thousands of files quickly every 10 ms delay per file adds up. -- Will Internet: westes AT earthbroadcast.com "Nik Simpson" wrote in message news Silly question, but why not serve the disks up to the "writer" and share it from so that the readers access via a network share? -- Nik Simpson |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Will napisał(a):
I'm looking for a cheap way to have more than one computer share read-only access to fibre channel storage under Windows 2000. I'm using Compaq fibre channel arrays for the hardware, and those are fine for low-end use, but they don't have any option internally to give read-only access. A host is designated in the Compaq software as either having full access or no access. If multiple Windows hosts try to write to the same logical device, they will trash sensitive file system structures on the disk. Is there any low-priced software that would run as a service on Windows that would prevent any attempt to write to designated disks? The service would need to be fairly low level and would need to prevent the Windows kernel from writing to the disk. Maybe Tivoli SANergy software would help you - but I'm not sure if it's Cheap ;-). http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivo...ducts/sanergy/ Huba |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Will" wrote in message ... It's a good question, but it was just my assumption that the network introduces latency on each operation. When you need to open thousands of files quickly every 10 ms delay per file adds up. I'd certainly be tempted to give it a try, if it works, its a lot easier than trying to share the device via the SAN without using software designed for that purpose. -- Nik Simpson |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A8V not booting | Rob | Asus Motherboards | 7 | May 22nd 05 10:13 AM |
Rules of the Road for Fibre Channel Interop | news.directlink.net | Storage & Hardrives | 6 | February 26th 04 09:17 PM |
FA Fibre Channel Hardware | Tom Olson | Compaq Servers | 1 | February 6th 04 07:34 PM |
FA Fibre Channel Hardware | Tom Olson | Storage (alternative) | 1 | February 4th 04 11:30 PM |
dual channel U2 storage system | Martin Rogoff | Compaq Computers | 1 | September 17th 03 11:15 PM |