If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
i dunno but i get 43,xxx with the same setup as you (except A7n8x MOBO)
"methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... "MikeE" wrote in message ... "methylenedioxy" wrote in message news Bull**** No way did you get that score...... Grow up, I ran Aquamark again and here you go: http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=467166024 MikeE So how do you explain that one then? I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and 400fsb memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro speeds on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then? http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Your system seems slow as i get fully 2,000 more points than you.
A7n8X deluxe , 512 Mb Kingston HyperX 9700 AIW XP2500 @11x200 I get around 39,000 with no overclocking on the vid card. "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... "MikeE" wrote in message .. . "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results, something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at 333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running at 266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody scoring mechanism is all wrong.... I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200 I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can cheat it. MikeE Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212 So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't trust? http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
28,XXX with an Asus A7n8x (non deluxe) , 512 of Corsair PC3200C2, Athlon xp
1700+ @ 8x200 and a RAdeon 9600PRO @ 492/341 Core/MEM "Shawk" wrote in message ... Hiya, Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they fared? GFX - 3420 CPU - 4165 Score - 24,243 Asus A7V8X XP2100+ (palomino) Sapphire 9600 pro 512meg PC2700 Cheers, Shawk. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
AquaMark Sco 44064
CPU Sco 10331 (P4c at 3.3Ghz) GFX Sco 5598 RADEON 9700 PRO Graphics Card Core Clockrate: 371 MHz (MegaHertz) Graphics Card Memory Clockrate: 344 MHz (MegaHertz) Graphics Card Driver Version: 6.14.10.6378 (cat 3.7) Graphics Card Video Memory: 134217728 Byte ( ~128 MegaByte) Graphics Texture Memory: Byte ( ~239 MegaByte) "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... "MikeE" wrote in message .. . "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results, something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at 333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running at 266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody scoring mechanism is all wrong.... I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200 I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can cheat it. MikeE Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212 So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't trust? http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
NICE!
Your about 1500 points higher then my overclocked 9700 Pro but my CPU makes up for allot! Your overclocked 9800 Pro on a P4c would be amazing!! Great Score. Now go play some games "John David Carter" wrote in message ... "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... "MikeE" wrote in message ... "methylenedioxy" wrote in message news Bull**** No way did you get that score...... Grow up, I ran Aquamark again and here you go: http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=467166024 MikeE So how do you explain that one then? I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and 400fsb memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro speeds on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then? http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048 Hmmm... Can't figure it, but my sco 45525 http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=138422817 GFX: 6312 CPU: 8158 FPS: 45.53 XP2500+ ( Barton ) @ 2405mhz on Abit NF7-S 2.0 9800pro @ 410/360 dx9b - cat. 3.7 ( Omegas 2.4.78 ) 1Gb Corsair XMS3200 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
How about this with FSAA-2X and AF-4X
AquaMark Sco 37686 CPU Sco 10397 GFX Sco 4602 Average Frame Rate: 37.6 And this with FSAA-4Xand AF-4X AquaMark Sco 35617 CPU Sco 10409 GFX Sco 4296 Average Frame Rate: 35.6 At FSAA-2X and AF-4X I was getting lots of display corruption with the new Cat. 3.7 drivers but with FSAA-4X and AF-4X all display corruption went away! Weird. This 9700 Pro is very powerfull at FSAA and AF, I'm very happy with it. "fish" wrote in message et... AquaMark Sco 44064 CPU Sco 10331 (P4c at 3.3Ghz) GFX Sco 5598 RADEON 9700 PRO Graphics Card Core Clockrate: 371 MHz (MegaHertz) Graphics Card Memory Clockrate: 344 MHz (MegaHertz) Graphics Card Driver Version: 6.14.10.6378 (cat 3.7) Graphics Card Video Memory: 134217728 Byte ( ~128 MegaByte) Graphics Texture Memory: Byte ( ~239 MegaByte) "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... "MikeE" wrote in message .. . "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results, something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at 333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running at 266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody scoring mechanism is all wrong.... I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200 I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can cheat it. MikeE Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212 So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't trust? http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
hehehe woo hoo just for kicks i ran the damn thing on my 7500aiw 6500+/-....GFX was something like 629 i think...CPU was 5XXX
"Shawk" wrote in message ... Hiya, Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they fared? GFX - 3420 CPU - 4165 Score - 24,243 Asus A7V8X XP2100+ (palomino) Sapphire 9600 pro 512meg PC2700 Cheers, Shawk. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Kirby Crosby" wrote in message
.rogers.com... Your system seems slow as i get fully 2,000 more points than you. A7n8X deluxe , 512 Mb Kingston HyperX 9700 AIW XP2500 @11x200 I get around 39,000 with no overclocking on the vid card. "methylenedioxy" wrote in message Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212 So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't trust? http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328 Know what? Me and Kirby have Bartons, while methylenedioxy has a Tbird... Also, I would wonder what what type of ram methylenedioxy has... Maybe the extra L2 cache and tighter ram timings make the difference... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I got C:7560, G:6030, and S:43127.
I gained 1200 in score just from changing from Omega drivers to Cat3.7s I'm going to try shutting off some services, which brought me up 700 in score with the Omegas. http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_use...tMeasurement=0 I'll try it on my kid's machine tomorrow, it has a 9600pro On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:10:01 +0000 (UTC), "Shawk" wrote: Hiya, Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they fared? GFX - 3420 CPU - 4165 Score - 24,243 Asus A7V8X XP2100+ (palomino) Sapphire 9600 pro 512meg PC2700 Cheers, Shawk. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Roger Squires" wrote in message
m... Looks like I'm the high man here so far: 46300. http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=234036815 Seems as though FSB speed counts for alot... 231! What mobo? ram? Any special cooling? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aquamark - What does it mean? | Sandman | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | August 5th 04 05:43 PM |
Intel IG2 (865G) aquamark 3 | EA | Gigabyte Motherboards | 0 | July 14th 04 01:43 AM |
Aquamark 3 (again) | methylenedioxy | Ati Videocards | 1 | September 14th 03 11:22 PM |