If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:04:10 -0500, (Ant) wrote:
Can I buy a 2 TB SSD for really cheap yet The 2TB Micron SSD for less than $300 that was mentioned in the article is really cheap, compared to other 2TB SSD models. like a HDD price? HDD's are still less expensive, on a per-TB basis, but things appear to be poised to get a lot better soon. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 19:59:49 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote: Every time it went pear shaped you had to take the cover off and tamp all the chips back down, I'M glad I never owned one, it was a real disaster. Standard operations, I'd assume. My first past over an XT MB's ISA extension with AST Rampage, earls EMS standards, (with a MegaByte or two), was solely for swapping programs through a 384K physical window about 640K conventions: They were all same-same, or socket-chipped RAM: no differently for an Intel 386SX motherboard, then, which was populated by 8 banks of 9 chips to each, with each memory chip being a requirement of the buyer to install by hand-insertion. Chip maintenance, therefore, could be quite the extensible operation when a computer program "crashed". Altogether ignoring a power outage state, the first indicative is BIOS post faults in accounting memory population. Never to fear, though. I don't recall much in the way of established forums for an Internet, indeed if such existed;- 1200BAUD, though, might get you into a couple so-called transatlantic forms, mostly for Britain, as an English speaking capacity. Hardware or its experts might as easily be deferred to the Bulletin Board Operators, to our present age and status popularly assessed wiz-kid hackers, sometimes, even for an odd industrial advocate representative of brandname engineering. In any event, I had, perhaps still do, (stuffed away somewhere), a relic bag of mystical properties containing extra memory chips for performing the rites of a dead-machine revival. How I got good at it, and if ever I actually was, apart from never being shorted long from an actual memory population, that time is too distant to correctly recall. Chip failure faults, however, then and as now, if ever anything but surface mounts might occur, (I've an amp or two with them, seated EPROM and such), is a regular condition from an inspection and maintenance standpoint. (Cursory and expected, prior to an impromptu techbench and going after Chinese(TM) cold-solder joints, or, Zeus forbid, an actual condition requiring synching an O-Scope waveform or Digital Logic Probes.) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Mark Perkins wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:04:10 -0500, (Ant) wrote: Can I buy a 2 TB SSD for really cheap yet The 2TB Micron SSD for less than $300 that was mentioned in the article is really cheap, compared to other 2TB SSD models. Still expensive to me. like a HDD price? HDD's are still less expensive, on a per-TB basis, but things appear to be poised to get a lot better soon. Yeah, I will wait again. -- Quote of the Week: "You feel the faint grit of ants beneath your shoes, but keep on walking because in this world you have to decide what you're willing to kill." --Tony Hoagland from "Candlelight" Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit- | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link. \ _ / ( ) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:42:22 -0400, Michael Black
wrote: But I've never had a hard drive problem. That goes back to 1993, when I go tmy first hard drive. I've moved on to different hard drives, but that's because of a different computer or wanting more space. But none have failed, not even the ones that had been used when I got them. I'm sure that when I get around to turning on that computer from 2003, which was used at the time, the hard drive will be fine. Though I splurged on a new hard drive, a 160g, about 2006. But it stayed on most of the time till I moved to a different computer in 2012. Hard drives became reliable at some point, and so cheap. And I'm yet to be convinced that an SSD is appreciably faster than a mechanical hard drive. Though it helps that I leave the computer on, so any "slowness" of booting is an iregular thing. Michael A SSD you have to work a little with for the appreciation factor, but there is no need to be convinced about it, any more than a rooster can stop itself from crowing when it senses the sun rising. Think copying files, which are magnitudes, a minimum of two, three, and more, faster than platters. Think of the pain in other than a relative significance, say to time, not to be ignored when extensively reworking large files as part of programming routine reserved for SSD working areas. HDDs were never reliable. They're prone to be more or less reliable due to periods and episodes relating to manufacture reputation and regard. Axiomatically that would equate into dog vernacular and every one has its day. It's like me saying I don't have car accidents. The insurance guys love me when I say that. Their stock reply: 'Well then, aren't you just an accident waiting to happen'. . . Or assessing a lawyer for virtue;- they've all worked at the DA Office for a stint as a prosecuting attorney, the good ones before setting up a private defense council. Sometimes the earth isn't flat and sometimes you just got to roll with it. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On 2018-08-09, Ant wrote:
Still expensive to me. The current SSD sweet spot for price seems to be 500GB size. Larger than that and price goes up quickly. My main desktop system has 500GB SSD and several TB of mechanical storage. I also have several laptops upgraded to smallish SSDs. Yeah, I will wait again. 7200 RPM mechanical drives aren't too bad, and there are hybrid drives available that get a boost from some onboard flash storage. A lot of new PCs come with dog-slow 5400 RPM drives though and those are real frustrating to work with. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.) NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018, Ant wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Mark Perkins wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:04:10 -0500, (Ant) wrote: Can I buy a 2 TB SSD for really cheap yet The 2TB Micron SSD for less than $300 that was mentioned in the article is really cheap, compared to other 2TB SSD models. Still expensive to me. Yes, it's in the range where I wouldn't buy without a lot of thought. On the other hand, I paid somewhere around $500 in 1984 for a 5.25" floppy drive, a case and power supply and controller, for a Radio Shack COlor Computer, and that was from a local third party. When I got a hand me down Mac Plus in 1983, I got my first hard drive because a second floppy drive would have been fairly expensive, it being a Mac. But that 80meg hard drive in late 1993 must have been close to $500 at the time. The last new hard drive I bought was in 2006, a 160gig, and I recall it was just over a hundred dollars. I never did fill that drive up, though I tried. Michael |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Roger Blake wrote:
On 2018-08-09, Ant wrote: Still expensive to me. The current SSD sweet spot for price seems to be 500GB size. Larger than that and price goes up quickly. My main desktop system has 500GB SSD and several TB of mechanical storage. I also have several laptops upgraded to smallish SSDs. I easily used up a 115 GB and 256 GB SSDs. 512 GB is went down to 190 GB. -- Quote of the Week: "You feel the faint grit of ants beneath your shoes, but keep on walking because in this world you have to decide what you're willing to kill." --Tony Hoagland from "Candlelight" Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit- | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link. \ _ / ( ) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On 08/09/2018 11:26 AM, Paul wrote:
Rene Lamontagne wrote: Do anyone here remember the Apple III walkout era? Rene Socketed chips ? Ouch. https://www.hardwaresecrets.com/inside-the-apple-iii/3/ Some fun for the owner I guess. I hope the cover comes off the unit easily :-) Â*Â* Paul Every time it went pear shaped you had to take the cover off and tamp all the chips back down, I'M glad I never owned one, it was a real disaster. Rene |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
On 8/9/2018 4:28 AM, Paul wrote:
Bill wrote: mike wrote: How's the reliability? I'm still reading that they fail catastrophically without warning. I've heard that the reliability of SSDs far exceeds that of the mechanical hard drives (for, in fact, an obvious reason--no moving parts). The "trim" software for my Intel SSD even provides an indication of the drive's reliability (I'm not sure how well that works). I do regular backups too. You're the perfect customer for an SSD. You're mixing up reliability and wear life. I beg to differ. When the drive QUITS WORKING, that's end of life. Doesn't matter what caused it. If the drive says, "hey, I'm wearing out, replace me," that's OK. When the drive says, "Hey, I'm read only," that's survivable. When the drive just bricks and becomes unreadable without warning, that's UNACCEPTABLE, by any measure. The excuse, "you didn't check the smart data...your fault" is UNACCEPTABLE. Stuff happens and there ain't much you can do about it. DESIGNED IN hard failure is unacceptable. It is not at all easy to determine what to expect on any version drive from any vendor. It's all proprietary and secret. I get all my stuff at garage sales, so I don't get a lot of choice. I spent the last day messing with a SSD in win10. I learned a few things. Don't put a 2.5" SSD into a box that makes it a 3.5" form factor and plug that into a hot-swap drive bay. The operative word is "HOT". I won't do that again. It's a 256GB Kingston ssdNOW200V. It was made right at the point where SSD's went from crap to not-quite-as-crappy. Most of the available info on that drive relates to the Version 3, or doesn't say which version it applies to. That's why I didn't install it back in the day. I backed up my spinner and restored it to the SSD. Macrium recognized it as a SSD, and I expected it to be aligned. Nope! The Kingston Utility says it's not aligned. I fired up my trusty Hirens and ran the partition utility align function. It has always worked in the past, but on this one, it says it can't align the partition because it's already aligned. I screwed around with it for hours and never got a bootable aligned partition. Gave up and reformatted/installed win10 1803. It runs now and all the utilities agree that partitions are aligned. I'm just too lazy to reinstall everything for what I perceive to be marginal improvement. There's gotta be an easier way to migrate. Maybe it's better with a newer drive. The install was faster than on a spinner. Boot is noticeably faster. I might convince myself that operation was slightly faster, but not enough to spend any real money on a SSD. The SSD in the laptop did improve boot time enough to convince me to leave it in there. Reliability consists of two components. Say a solder joint on the PCB fails. It causes the device to stop delivering the intended function. That's part of the reliability number. Let's pretend for the sake of argument, it's an MTBF of 2 million hours. In some cases, just the tiny power converter inside, making VCore for some chip, might dominate the reliability calc (you can't make a power converter better than about 10 million hours or 100 FITS). OK, well, what rate do bugs show up in the SSD firmware ? We don't know. We do know, that early SSDs "bricked" due to firmware. In some cases, the drive even "bricked" during a firmware update (but of course the owner backed up the data, making the situation not quite the same). In a system at work, our reliability expert (a guy with a PhD in the subject), warned that some large products we were selling, it was quite possible the software was dropping the system reliability by a factor of 10. Now the MTBF is down to 200,000 hours. You will find Seagate and WDC unwilling to factor this in. While our reliability expert argued for this, only field data could indicate how sucky our software was. ******* Wear life is different. Both hard drives and SSDs wear. In the case of the SSD, the mechanism is known and predictable. If you know the temperature when the writes were done, you know the temperature of the media over long-term life, you can make a reasonably accurate prediction of wear. (High temperatures anneal defects, but high temperatures might also shorten retention time.) Hard drives are different. The manufacturer won't admit to wear. The manufacturer won't prepare large quantities of drives, and simulate life conditions, and provide curves related to wear. But, third party studies have noted wear characteristics in the failure population curves. Instead of a traditional bathtub curve, drive failures have another shape in the graph. There are tremendous differences between various model numbers for this (things that might be noted by Newegg reviewers if a model is for sale for long enough). ******* Now, let's summarize: What do you have to know as an SSD owner. 1) Consider the history of the technology. You're doing basically what my PhD guy at work was doing, consulting a "field return data" log and noting brickage, brickage caused by bad firmware. For early SSD drives, you wouldn't touch them with a barge pole. Especially the ones with "predictable brickage", where the device fails after being powered for exactly 30 days. Owners who didn't hear about the 30 day brickage, might not have known (in time) that there was a firmware update for it, to be applied in advance. If it bricked and you had no backup (because it was "reliable"), well, "fool you once". Now you're learning. 2) Consider the wear life. The drives are taking fewer and fewer write cycles per flash location, as the technology "advances". The storage cells are getting "mushy". SLC, MLC, TLC, QLC. SLC is great stuff. Maybe 100,000 write cycles and 10 year retention. QLC might be 1,000 write cycles and ?? year retention. A Samsung TLC was showing signs of being "mushy", by requiring significant error correction inside (to the point it was slowing the read rate). Roughly 10% of the storage capacity on the drive, is reserved for ECC code storage, protecting the data from errors. That is a very high ratio, much highe than hard drives in the past. It's quite possible every sector has at least one error in it, corrected by the CPU inside before you get it. And now, they're just starting to ship QLC. 3) Consider the end of life policy. Not all the drive brands have the same policy. Some return an error on each write at end of life (as a cheap way of warning you), causing the SSD to enter "read-only state". That is a reasonable policy, helping to warn and cover people who refuse to make backups. Windows won't run on a read only device, so you'll be smothered in error dialogs. That will get your attention, and make you back up the drive. But Intel just "bricks" the drive, when the *computed* wear value is exceeded. With an Intel brand SSD, you had better be monitoring the "life remaining percentage" *very very carefully* . That's why the promotion in that Toms article above is particularly egregious. The dude is promoting an Intel QLC SSD (yuck!) which has a total-brickage end-of-life policy (double yuck!). What could go wrong ? If you're not paying attention, Beuler, you suddenly lose access to your data. Did you have backups ? No ? "Fool you twice". So, yeah, SSDs have no moving parts, and hay, they're "reliable". A stupid MIL spec calc prepared by the marketing department (not by engineers), says so. The firmware could have bugs. Not quantified in a MIL spec calc. They could have include field data in the MIL spec calc, but they'd be nuts to do so. No one is there to slap their fingers for failing to do this. The history of SSDs would mean dropping the MIL spec calc by a factor of ten. No marketing guy is going to allow that. But if your Sherman Tank is booted off an SSD, you can be damn sure two PhDs got into a spat about what the real reliability is. Between big companies doing business, the MTBF is "negotiated". The customer would say "hay, idiot, include firmware reliability in your calc". The wear life is tangible. There's an indicator in SMART. What is the brickage policy of your brand ? Pay attention! Is an SSD the same as a hard drive ? No, it is not. HTH, Paul |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Why I Will Never Buy a Hard Drive Again"
mike wrote:
On 8/9/2018 4:28 AM, Paul wrote: Bill wrote: mike wrote: How's the reliability? I'm still reading that they fail catastrophically without warning. I've heard that the reliability of SSDs far exceeds that of the mechanical hard drives (for, in fact, an obvious reason--no moving parts). The "trim" software for my Intel SSD even provides an indication of the drive's reliability (I'm not sure how well that works). I do regular backups too. You're the perfect customer for an SSD. You're mixing up reliability and wear life. I beg to differ. When the drive QUITS WORKING, that's end of life. Doesn't matter what caused it. We have to be careful to separate the component parts though. Some aspects of the electronics you use, can never be all that good. They could never last "forever". The best power converter they could make at work, was around 10 million hours MTBF. The guys who did that, were pretty product of their tiny gadget. The bathtub shaped curve, assumes failures are random, and are a function of the "quality" or the "architecture" of the item. Having an actual wearout behavior, that is not a random phenomenon. That's predictable. Say I start writing my brand new M.2 motherboard SSD at 2.5GB/sec. And I do that all day long, day after day. These devices don't have enough wear life, to make it all the way to the end of the warranty period while doing that. If you do that to the drive, grind it into the ground, all the retailer has to do, is check the wear life and point out to the customer "you wore it out, it didn't fail as such". You would be denied warranty relief at retail level or at factory level. The warranty covers the "random stuff". The stuff that went into the MTBF calculation. Everyone knows that like toilet paper, the number of write cycles is limited. If a customer burns them up, they won't be providing a shiny new drive for the customer to burn up a third, fourth, or fifth time. If it's determined a customer abused a product, then there's no warranty. Maybe your credit card provides more extensive product insurance, but the normal retail relationship mainly covers product defects. And wear is not a defect. It's an expected parameter a customer can control, by not doing too many writes per day... If I buy a gallon of paint at Home Depot, apply it to the walls, when the can is empty I can't run to the store and go "Defect! Defect! This can is empty. I blame the hole on top." The warranty might cover a failure of the chemical composition (maybe the drying accelerator agent is missing and the paint never dries for you). But simply using up the quantity of materials in the can, doesn't entitle you to a "infinite refill". I can't paint the Brooklyn Bridge with one can of paint. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"One Billion Drive Hours and Counting: Q1 2016 Hard Drive Stats" | Lynn McGuire[_2_] | Storage (alternative) | 7 | May 22nd 16 07:30 AM |
External USB hard drive showing wrong "Free Space" "Used Space" inthe Capacity | RayLopez99 | Homebuilt PC's | 3 | February 17th 14 09:40 PM |
USB bootable maker: Diff between "HP Drive Key Boot Utility" and "HP USB Disk Storage Format Tool"? | Jason Stacy | Storage (alternative) | 1 | April 21st 09 01:14 AM |
WinExplorer shows no "Used space/Free space" in properties for USB stick drive ? "Optimized for quick removal" error? | Joe deAngelo | Storage (alternative) | 0 | January 18th 08 02:28 PM |
Western Digital "My Book" - Replacing the hard drive | [email protected] | Storage (alternative) | 0 | July 8th 06 06:31 PM |