George Macdonald wrote:
On 25 Jul 2005 13:00:56 -0700, "Robert Myers" wrote:

Felger Carbon wrote:
"Robert Myers" wrote in message
oups.com...

large snip

...I don't
think I have any chance of getting you or anyone else here even to
consider the possibility that you have made an incorrect conclusion
about what's happened so far.

That sounds an awful lot like "everybody's out of step but me",

And what is the significance of a poll of a self-selected group? If it
were up to csiphc regulars, there would be no need for AMD to sue
Intel. As the sales numbers show, csiphc isn't representative of much
of anything, except its own obsessions.

People here are mostly technical, who get enthusiastic for the superior
technology, performance/$ and performance /watt... apart from apparently
you and yet... you claim to value technology. When challenged on this you
take a position of ignorance since you have obviously not looked at the
details of the AMD CPUs because you choose to ignore them with prejudice.

Nope, the only obsession here is yours.. to defend the reputation of a
company with inferior product and which has soiled its err, name.


At this point, I feel only as if I were defending myself.

RM