View Single Post
  #4  
Old January 19th 04, 07:34 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...mindspring.com
(Messages 10, 12 -- 34, 54 -- 69)

( No pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of the above is a libel )
( -- despite Mikey's supposed to have proof of misquotes! )


Mike Richter (Friggin' ****) wrote:

In the real world, most packet-writing software historically has not
followed the spec and therefore has been inconsistent with some or all
of the others. When I used UDF, I ran DirectCD; one of its virtues was
that it was compliant with the spec.


How does DirectCD comply with the faulty format (spec), Mikey?

================================================== ================
Subject: Packet writing and XP Home

Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum) wrote (1/5/04):

There is a UDF standard. At least until recently...
only Roxio was fully compliant with it.


How does DirectCD comply with the faulty format (standard), Mikey?

---------------------------------------------------------
From: smh
Subject: UDF/Packet Writing Compatibility:
Date: 3/6/03

Mike Richter (Slimy Scum) wrote:

As you now know, there is a standard for UDF, but
not all "packet writing" software complies with it.


How do softwares comply with the 'faulty' format, Mikey?

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"
-----------------------------------------------------------

================================================== ================