View Single Post
  #123  
Old December 9th 04, 07:36 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!


Are you coming, sicko?


Not in a public newsgroup, sicko!


Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

================================================== =====
Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****) splattered (7/16/04):

Note that results so far suggest that DVD-RW and DVD+RW are
no more reliable than CD-RW.


Thus, DVD-+RW is unreliable, I presume?

Anyhow, what results are those? What's the source? Did you just
dig that out of your ass?

Is CD-RW unreliable, Mikey?

Once upon a time the supposedly inherently flaky, fragile,
forgetful, unreliable CD-RW media was good enough for BACKUP,
of all things, even when combined with the supposedly inherently
flaky, fragile, faulty, unreliable packet "format" -- according to
none other than Mikey:

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill)
Date: 9/1/99

You may back up...to a DCD-formatted erasable.
=====================

I strongly recommend using write-once discs if
jetjock hopes to have the backup readable later.


Why is that Mikey? Have you established that DVD-+RW are
unreliable? All you presented -- without substantiation,
only on your say so -- is that DVD-+RW are no more reliable
than CD-RW.

If DVD-+RW are indeed unreliable --as you slimily intimate here--
why don't you dig it out of your ass and explicitly say so?
================================================== =========

-------------------------
What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------