View Single Post
  #35  
Old February 10th 04, 04:29 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

smh wrote:

. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...mindspring.com
(Messages 10, 12 -- 34, 54 -- 69)

( No pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of the above is a libel )
( -- despite Mikey's supposed to have proof of misquotes! )

ukaloo (Pipsqueak) spewed:

"Peter R" wrote...
What`s the reason for the apparent emnity between these two.Mike always
appears very helpful when a subject is raised.

smh has been at this for more than FOUR YEARS.
I was here at the beginning......such a long time ago......


Confirming Mike Richter (Lying Scum) has been making LIES and FRAUDS in
all those years!!!

======================
From: Mike Richter
Subject: TakeTwo: Take Two Boot Disc Issue with NT
Date: 9/22/99

1. If Take Two does not create a working boot disk to recover
an NT system, this is a bona fide bug, which IS a big deal
and must be fixed!


Assuming #1 is true, Adaptec, or Mr. Richter, have you created
a web page / patch to work around this problem yet?


That's really an Adaptec job - my site is not specific to their s/w.

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Liar)
Subject: Frauds by Mike Richter (1 of 2)
Date: 9/26/01

The workaround was documented ... in the primer
as soon as I found it.
======================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' Liar!
-------------------------------


--------------------------------------------
From: smh
Subject: aCRAPtec (Adaptec) is The Pits!
Date: 7/26/00
--------------------------------------------

=================================================
Have you heard of Take Two boot disk problem?


Result of no standard method of creating a bootable floppy under the NT4 and
2000, easy work around available

=================================================

This bug has never, ever been acknowledged as such by Acraptec.
Acraptec has been sitting on this bug for almost a year. Now, all you
can say about this is as if it's not the fault of Acraptec.

Is Acraptec going to dismiss the problem with the simple expedience that
there is an easy workaround available? How easy is the workaround? If
it's so easy, wonder why it couldn't be fixed. And where is this "easy"
workaround spelled out?

And if this is spelled out,
shouldn't it be on the known issues page?

Is a bug (in the usual sense) not a bug (in the Acraptec sense) if there
are work arounds available?

To think that it's been almost a year now and Acraptec still hasn't
found a fix. That "no standard" must be some real obstacle.

(Veritas must be some smart cookies, handling this "no standard" problem
with no problem at all.)

Is the boot disk problem the penalty one must pay for the privilege of
using such "far ahead" software like Take Two?