On 8/27/2010 9:06 AM, Robert Myers wrote:
On Aug 26, 9:51 pm, Yousuf wrote:
On 26/08/2010 10:29 AM, Robert Myers wrote:

On Aug 26, 1:07 am, Yousuf wrote:
So "scummy behaviour" is a judgment only god can make, now? Is it one of
the ten commandments: "Thou shalt not conduct thine behaviour scummily?

The eighth commandment, as Lutherans and RC's count, is "Thou shalt
not bear false witness against thy neighbor." If you are going to
accuse someone of something, you'd best have God-like certainty of
your standing to do so.

Ah, I see, so even scripture isn't above your spin-doctoring? That
commandment is quite obviously about committing perjury, and you've
turned it into "only god can know what went on"? Sorry god will never
take the witness stand, but trials are somehow still conducted and
verdicts rendered.

E-mail me privately, and I will show you the catechism. It isn't
about only God can know what went on. It's about defaming others
falsely, something you do regularly.

Circular logic, I corrected you by saying it's about perjury and you
agree with it, without admitting it. Is that your consent decree?

People like Chris speak as if their own judgments reflected some
obvious conclusion that anyone would draw. Leaving beliefs in the
supernatural entirely aside, Chris demonstrates over and over again
that he does not understand even the stated beliefs of our culture and
thus is an unlikely person to be proposing moral judgments (as
scripture would see it, in the place of God).

Get over it, Intel was found guilty by literally every authority who has
judged them so far. Not even god can disagree with that.

You don't understand how consent decrees work and you never will.
You're hopeless. Signing a consent agreement almost never involves an
admission of guilt. A "finding" of guilt requires a criminal
proceeding and a verdict. What you are engaged in here is corporate
defamation, a tort, for which you could be sued.

Robert.

You mean god is gonna sue me?

Yousuf Khan