View Single Post
  #30  
Old February 5th 04, 02:50 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...mindspring.com
(Messages 10, 12 -- 34, 54 -- 69)

( No pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of the above is a libel )
( -- despite Mikey's supposed to have proof of misquotes! )

smh wrote:

ukaloo (Pipsqueak) spewed:

smh has been at this for more than FOUR YEARS.
I was here at the beginning......such a long time ago......


Confirming Mike Richter (Lying Scum) has been making LIES and FRAUDS in
all those years!!!

===================================
Wife Beating Stopped, Mike Richter?
===================================

Could you take a time off from your pontificating and explain the
"discrepancy" between your posts of (10/31/99) and (3/23/00)?

======================
From: Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill)
Subject: Take Two Boot Disk
Date: (10/31/99)

I cannot create an Emergency Boot Floppy disk for Take Two...
Windows 98 2nd Edition


Take Two has problems with its boot disc in NT4;

I'm not surprised if it is also true in Win98 SE ... === Not Always

Then beat up on them for letting it out in that condition. === Beat Up

======================
From: Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill)
Subject: Adaptec Take 2 Restore problem
Date: (3/23/00)

smh wrote:
Does Take Two now make boot disk properly?


Take Two always made a valid boot disc for Win9x ... === Always

Does your question not read like the classic:

Have you stopped beating your wife? === Wife Beating
Like that one, yours cannot be answered simply.
======================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' ****!
-------------------------------


==========================
Mike Richter got Big Balls
==========================

[Subject was: Frauds by Mike Richter (1 of 2)]

Mike Richter (Friggin' ****) wrote:

It is pointless to argue with a troll; it has no brain and therefore
cannot understand logic.


This is commented on below.

The history of the issue is well documented. In fact, I was the first to
raise it to Adaptec (before the split) in the mailing list,


You were the first to discover it! Stupid, you just confirmed:

****ty In-House Testing at Acraptec
****ty Beta Testing at Acraptec
****ty Beta Testers at Acraptec

corrected the engineer who replied on-list and
finally had the satisfaction of his acknowledging the error.


Are you not proud of yourself! In your attempt to salvage your ass, you
only dug deeper holes for both your ass and Acraptec. Confirming again:

****ty In-House Testing at Acraptec
****ty Beta Testing at Acraptec
****ty Beta Testers at Acraptec

Did Acraptec do any testing at all?

The problem is not with NTFS but with NT and it
is inherent in the OS: it does not have a DOS underpinning.


It's so fundamental and elementary, yet the very engineeer(s) who wrote
the program was ignorant of it! But they are supposed to have written a
"so far ahead" software! This deserves to be on the **** List:

****ty Programmers at Acraptec
****ty In-House Testing at Acraptec
****ty Beta Testing at Acraptec
****ty Beta Testers at Acraptec

Is the "no brain" troll supposed to know something which even
the very engineer(s) who wrote the program was ignorant of?


The workaround was documented on the list
and in the primer as soon as I found it.


Ah, the workaround. Remember this? Acraptec's definition of bug:

A bug (in the usual sense) is not a bug (in the Acraptec sense)
if there is a workaround.

I am sure the fact that there is a workaround and that it's in the
primer will excuse you with your using words like, "so far ahead" and
"perfect." How could anyone to think that is beyond me.

(Oh, I know -- only someone with BIG BALLS !!!)


All that is for your information.
The troll has the same information,


The troll has "no brain," you intoned, remember? Yet the brainless
troll is supposed to know something!


but it is not interested in facts.


And you are interested in facts, I presume?

Is that why you omitted to mention the "error" in your (9/24/99) post?
Is that why you used words like, "so far ahead" and "perfect"?

it is so far ahead of every other backup product

I restored it with a boot floppy ...
and recovery was perfect.

Does the above give any hint that there is an "error" and that the
workaround is on your Web page? It only gives the impression that it's
the Second Coming.

Also, who would have guessed that "every other backup product" consists
of only one product, DriveImage. Right, Mike Richter is interested in
facts -- if it means omitting or concealing facts!

More Mike Richter's facts:

"I cannot get it to boot my NT system."
"I was the first to raise ... the error."

"I don't speak of T2's bugs because I haven't found them."

Right, Mike Richter, you are interested in facts -- if it means lying
about them!

I said this of you befo

-----------------------------------
Mike Richter, You Got Big Balls !!!
-----------------------------------