"jim fallon" skrev i en meddelelse
...
Just a note to tell anyone NOT to buy a Radeon 9600SE they are crap, get a
9500PRO if you can find one!!!
Your statement...
I have just replaced the 9600SE with a 9500PRO my first 3Dmark03 score was
2855 an increase of 61%!!!!
I think youŽre doing sth wring here.
Had 3200 with an 9200 and a Celeron
(see below for my system details)
By the way does anyone know how to check whether a card is a 9500 or a
9500PRO? Windows, 3Dmark reckons its a 9500 not a 9500PRO?
Thanks
Jim
My previous post regarding performance:
Graphics card: powercolor Radeon 9600SE, 128MB DDR
Motherboard: asus a7N8x deluxe
cpu: athlon xp 2000+
memory: single channel 512MB PC3200 at 166MHZ
PC3200 is 200mhz ( 2x ) isnŽt it ? 166mhz is PC2700, I think.
hard disks: 60mb + 80MB both 7200rpm
Windoze XP Pro SP1
This is a new board, I replaced an Asus A7133 with 256MB PC133 memory.
However with the new setup my 3DMark03 score only increased from 1670 to
1707 an increase of 2%.
Have I set it up incorrectly?
I'm considering replacing the 9600SE with an ATI Radeon 9500PRO 128MB,
from
Tom's benmarking this has far higher scores.
Any ideas?
I have just replaced the 9600SE with a 9500PRO my first 3Dmark03 score was
2855 an increase of 61%!!!!
Crossposted. Hmm...
To get this somehow ASUS related IŽll give you some reading he
ASUS P4B266 ( FSB100 (4x) board ! ), P4 2,8/533 @2960, 512mb PC2700 @376mhz,
5900XT, 300W PSU at (3D) Vcore 1,458, 12V at 11,477V.
16479 3D2001marks - 6469 3D2003 marks...
Do you run the tests with v-synch activated ?
Greetz
|