Evidently, westom1, you are the idiot. For the amount of time you have
spend spewing garbage in these forums, you should have gone and looked up
the answers, or called the companies. Nobody is going to be able to satisfy
you, even with full documentation, so go along on your merry way.


wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 10:24 am, bud-- wrote:
The village idiot still can't find what Christopher posted. Or refuses
to find. w_ is a fan of Josef Goebbels and thinks if you repeat the
lies often enough, people will believe it.

Again the sales promoter with no engineering training refuses to post
a single manufacturer spec that claims protection.

He does cite the IEEE and NIST citations - that both describe why
Bud's obscenely profitable plug-in protectors can even earth surge
8000 volts destructively through an adjacent appliance. Even his NIST
citation says a protector without earthing in not effective.

So how does Bud promoter ineffective plug-in protectors? Even every
telco everywhere in the world does not waste money on Bud's
protectors. Bud cannot even post a single manufacturer spec that
claims protection. So Bud posts insults. Bud will post incessently
to even get the last post. Profits are at risk if you learn the scam
promoted by Bud. Where is that manufacturer spec? A plug-in
protector does not even claim to provide that protection. But it sure
is profitable. Honesty is not Bud.

The informed consumer does what every telco does everywhere in the
world. Simply earth one 'whole house' protector. Scam protector
manufacturers do not make 'whole house' protectors. Profit margin on
effective solutions is too low. Profits are higher when lying,
selling a scam, and posting insults. Where is that manufacturer spec
number that claims protection?