View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 16th 03, 03:18 AM
jack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"jack" wrote in message
...


I had to make a choise. I could run the processor at 3.2 GHz and the
memory at 200 MHz, or I could run the processor at 3.52 GHz and the
memory at 176 MHz with the 5:4 ratio. Running the memory at 200 MHz gave
me a Sandra benchmarked data rate of 5.5 GHz/sec as opposed to the 4.8
GHz/second that I'm getting with the processor running at 3.2 GHz.



In my previous post, the last 3.2 GHz should read 3.52 GHz. That is,
with the processor running at 3.52 GHz the memory runs at 176 MHz and
gives me a memory bandwidth of 4.8 GHz/seccond.