View Single Post
  #9  
Old August 8th 03, 02:54 AM
Some One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Sean" wrote in message
...
why 1800+ vs p4 2.0

why not 1800+ vs p4 1.8 wouldnt that make more sence


Because an AMD does not use it's number to compare to Intel CPU's.

An AMD 1800+ XP runs (supposedly) as fast as an AMD T-Bird at 1800mhz
(which they don't make).

The best way (and still not 100% accurate) is to examine benchmarks of
the CPU's you are comparing, while running the same benchmark on as
similar as possible hardware.

and the amd is a lot cheaper the p4 is around 20% more expensive


I've lost faith in AMD with their deceptive numbering system, lack of
durable heat spreader bonded to the core, and questionable warranty
tactics. The Intel may be more money, but I'd feel more confident
running an Intel system. (All my systems are currently AMD and I
regret this more and more each day.)