A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Search Forums
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Showing results 1 to 17 of 17
Search took 0.01 seconds.
Search: Posts made by: kkkk
Forum: Storage & Hardrives August 10th 09, 06:40 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 6
Views: 1,007
Posted By kkkk
Writing to block device is *slower* than writing to the filesystem!?

Robert Nichols wrote:
Curious. I'm not seeing that behavior in either Centos 5 or Fedora
11 (coreutils-5.97-19.el5, coreutils-7.2-2.fc11). In both of those,
when I run:

strace dd...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives August 10th 09, 01:01 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 6
Views: 1,007
Posted By kkkk
Writing to block device is *slower* than writing to the filesystem!?

kkkk wrote:
Hi all,
we have a new machine with 3ware 9650SE controllers and I am testing ...

I found it! I found it!

dd apparently does not buffer writes correctly (good catch, Mark):...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives August 8th 09, 07:47 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 6
Views: 1,007
Posted By kkkk
Writing to block device is *slower* than writing to the filesystem!?

David Schwartz wrote:
There could be a lot of reasons, but the most likely is that they're
writing to opposite ends of the drive. To test, put a 'skip' in your
'dd' to the block device. See if...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives August 7th 09, 01:30 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 6
Views: 1,007
Posted By kkkk
Writing to block device is *slower* than writing to the filesystem!?

Hi all,
we have a new machine with 3ware 9650SE controllers and I am testing
hardware RAID and linux software MD raid performances
For now I am on hardware RAID. I have setup a raid-0 with 14...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives May 1st 09, 04:45 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid (LONG!)

Hi all
here are details. Actually most news are not good, but I appear to have
found one bottleneck: LVM, see below.

I confirm numbers the given previously, plus: (the following benchmarks
are...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 30th 09, 03:00 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

Hi all,
based on your suggestions I have been testing lots of stuff: xfs, ext2,
raw lvm device reads and writes, effect of bs in dd, disk scheduler,
noatime... Interesting stuff is coming out, and...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 28th 09, 11:55 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

Hi everybody,

Thanks for your suggestions

I have seen the suggestions by Guy and Patrick to raise the bs for dd. I
had already tried various values for this, up to a very large value, and
I even...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 24th 09, 03:33 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

This guy

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2008-September/005170.html

is doing basically the same as I am doing with software raid done with
ZFS in freebsd (raid-Z2 is basically...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 24th 09, 12:00 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

wrote:
U comp.arch.storage kkkk prica:
I haven't tested RAID6 on 9650SE, but have tested RAID5 on 9650SE (older
generation on PCI-X), and IIRC...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 24th 09, 11:09 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

wrote:
What performance would you expect from 3ware raid-6 12-disks with ext3
(defaults mount) sequential dd write?

I haven't tested RAID6 on 9650SE, but...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 24th 09, 10:56 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

Bill Todd wrote:
That said, it's possible that the Linux system file cache interacts
poorly with md in terms of how it destages data to the array - e.g., if
it hands data to md in chunks that...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 24th 09, 10:23 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

David Brown wrote:

I did spend a few minutes in Google trying to find detailed
information about md's RAID-6 implementation but got nowhere.
...
There is a lot more information about...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 24th 09, 10:10 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

David Schwartz wrote:
It is the bottleneck, it's just not a CPU bottleneck, it's an I/O
bottleneck.

With an 8x PCI-e bus there should be space for 2 GB/sec transfer...

The problem is simply...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 23rd 09, 03:37 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

David Brown wrote:
If you have so many disks connected, did you consider having at least
one as a hot spare?

Of course! We have 4 spares shared among all the arrays.

Secondly, did you...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 23rd 09, 01:45 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

David Schwartz wrote:
How mind-blowingly awful. I'm sure there must be some set of
circumstances that justify such a ridiculously poor setup, but I don't
know what they could possibly be....
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 23rd 09, 11:51 AM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

wrote:
U comp.arch.storage kkkk prica:
We are using an ext3 filesystem with defaults mount on top of LVM + MD
raid 6. The raid-6 is on 12 disks...
Forum: Storage & Hardrives April 22nd 09, 08:29 PM Posted to comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.arch.storage
Replies: 32
Views: 2,198
Posted By kkkk
Unimpressive performance of large MD raid

Hi there,
we have a big "storage" computer: dual Xeon (8 cores
total) with lots of disks partly connected to a 3ware 9650SE controller
and partly to the SATA/SAS controllers in the...
Showing results 1 to 17 of 17

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.