Building a box for a Net drive
So I've been thinking about building a box for a net drive at home for
photography and graphic art storage and such. I have an ASUS A7V600X-E board here and a 2400 Athlon and three 256M sticks of various PC2100 and 2700 RAM. I was going to put Windows 2000 Pro on an IDE 8.4G or 10G drive and put two 640G WD Blue or two 750G WD Green drives on the two SATA ports. Originally I was going to RAID them (even though I've never done that) and map them as a net drive on two of the XP Home machines here (never done that either). I read a review on the Green drives that suggests they don't like RAID and the constant running shortens the life span and makes extra heat (and noise to cool them). So I was thinking that I have a copy of Acronis True Image 9.0 here that's not doing anything and wondered if I could just map one of the drives and somehow tell Acronis to keep them mirrored incrementally every day thereby keeping a safe copy and yet working them less and getting another 110Gigs for the same money. Is that a better option? Anything else I need to think about? |
Building a box for a Net drive
"Jess Fertudei" wrote in message ... So I've been thinking about building a box for a net drive at home for photography and graphic art storage and such. I have an ASUS A7V600X-E board here and a 2400 Athlon and three 256M sticks of various PC2100 and 2700 RAM. I was going to put Windows 2000 Pro on an IDE 8.4G or 10G drive and put two 640G WD Blue or two 750G WD Green drives on the two SATA ports. Originally I was going to RAID them (even though I've never done that) and map them as a net drive on two of the XP Home machines here (never done that either). I read a review on the Green drives that suggests they don't like RAID and the constant running shortens the life span and makes extra heat (and noise to cool them). So I was thinking that I have a copy of Acronis True Image 9.0 here that's not doing anything and wondered if I could just map one of the drives and somehow tell Acronis to keep them mirrored incrementally every day thereby keeping a safe copy and yet working them less and getting another 110Gigs for the same money. Is that a better option? Anything else I need to think about? I'm not sure, but I think you'll have to upgrade your acronis software. I know I had an earlier version of acronis (9, I believe) that wouldn't play nicely with SATA drives. I've got version 11 of Acronis now, no problems with it and SATA drives. It's your build, and I haven't priced hard drives recently, but to keep it simple, I'd probably get an IDE drive of about 500G or so, then buy the largest SATA drive I could find. Create two partitions on the IDE drive, one 10GB, and the other using all the remaining space. Put your OS on the IDE drive on the small partition (of course). Then create two partitions on the SATA drive. One small partition, say 10Gigs. Use Acronis to backup drive C: to that small partition on the SATA drive periodically. Do this backup manually, whenever you think about it. (not as critical to do automatic backups of this) Then set acronis to backup the OTHER partition on the SATA drive automatically, to the large partition of the IDE drive. That's how I'd handle it. -Dave |
Building a box for a Net drive
"Jess Fertudei" wrote in message ... So I've been thinking about building a box for a net drive at home for photography and graphic art storage and such. I have an ASUS A7V600X-E board here and a 2400 Athlon and three 256M sticks of various PC2100 and 2700 RAM. I was going to put Windows 2000 Pro on an IDE 8.4G or 10G drive and put two 640G WD Blue or two 750G WD Green drives on the two SATA ports. Originally I was going to RAID them (even though I've never done that) and map them as a net drive on two of the XP Home machines here (never done that either). I read a review on the Green drives that suggests they don't like RAID and the constant running shortens the life span and makes extra heat (and noise to cool them). So I was thinking that I have a copy of Acronis True Image 9.0 here that's not doing anything and wondered if I could just map one of the drives and somehow tell Acronis to keep them mirrored incrementally every day thereby keeping a safe copy and yet working them less and getting another 110Gigs for the same money. Is that a better option? Anything else I need to think about? Check that to read A7V600X (no E... thinking about another board) |
Building a box for a Net drive
"Dave" wrote in message ... "Jess Fertudei" wrote in message ... So I've been thinking about building a box for a net drive at home for photography and graphic art storage and such. I have an ASUS A7V600X-E board here and a 2400 Athlon and three 256M sticks of various PC2100 and 2700 RAM. I was going to put Windows 2000 Pro on an IDE 8.4G or 10G drive and put two 640G WD Blue or two 750G WD Green drives on the two SATA ports. Originally I was going to RAID them (even though I've never done that) and map them as a net drive on two of the XP Home machines here (never done that either). I read a review on the Green drives that suggests they don't like RAID and the constant running shortens the life span and makes extra heat (and noise to cool them). So I was thinking that I have a copy of Acronis True Image 9.0 here that's not doing anything and wondered if I could just map one of the drives and somehow tell Acronis to keep them mirrored incrementally every day thereby keeping a safe copy and yet working them less and getting another 110Gigs for the same money. Is that a better option? Anything else I need to think about? I'm not sure, but I think you'll have to upgrade your acronis software. I know I had an earlier version of acronis (9, I believe) that wouldn't play nicely with SATA drives. I've got version 11 of Acronis now, no problems with it and SATA drives. It's your build, and I haven't priced hard drives recently, but to keep it simple, I'd probably get an IDE drive of about 500G or so, then buy the largest SATA drive I could find. Create two partitions on the IDE drive, one 10GB, and the other using all the remaining space. Put your OS on the IDE drive on the small partition (of course). Then create two partitions on the SATA drive. One small partition, say 10Gigs. Use Acronis to backup drive C: to that small partition on the SATA drive periodically. Do this backup manually, whenever you think about it. (not as critical to do automatic backups of this) Then set acronis to backup the OTHER partition on the SATA drive automatically, to the large partition of the IDE drive. That's how I'd handle it. -Dave Thanks. I'd like to avoid any system that compresses these files, if possible. Mirrored or redundant drives would be ideal for this situation. I will have to look into the True Image 9.0 and how it interacts with SATA, I guess. I need to keep the price down on this and will RAID if I *have* to as opposed to buying more software. I guess I could find two IDE drives but that limits their future and I would like to keep them as near to 700G or higher as I can afford right now. We do a lot of this work and are filling drives too quickly. Unfortunately we have a recession thing going or I would spend a lot more... it's very important to me. Thanks again! |
Building a box for a Net drive
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:13:52 -0400, Jess Fertudei rearranged some
electrons to say: "Dave" wrote in message ... "Jess Fertudei" wrote in message ... So I've been thinking about building a box for a net drive at home for photography and graphic art storage and such. I have an ASUS A7V600X-E board here and a 2400 Athlon and three 256M sticks of various PC2100 and 2700 RAM. I was going to put Windows 2000 Pro on an IDE 8.4G or 10G drive and put two 640G WD Blue or two 750G WD Green drives on the two SATA ports. Originally I was going to RAID them (even though I've never done that) and map them as a net drive on two of the XP Home machines here (never done that either). I read a review on the Green drives that suggests they don't like RAID and the constant running shortens the life span and makes extra heat (and noise to cool them). So I was thinking that I have a copy of Acronis True Image 9.0 here that's not doing anything and wondered if I could just map one of the drives and somehow tell Acronis to keep them mirrored incrementally every day thereby keeping a safe copy and yet working them less and getting another 110Gigs for the same money. Is that a better option? Anything else I need to think about? I'm not sure, but I think you'll have to upgrade your acronis software. I know I had an earlier version of acronis (9, I believe) that wouldn't play nicely with SATA drives. I've got version 11 of Acronis now, no problems with it and SATA drives. It's your build, and I haven't priced hard drives recently, but to keep it simple, I'd probably get an IDE drive of about 500G or so, then buy the largest SATA drive I could find. Create two partitions on the IDE drive, one 10GB, and the other using all the remaining space. Put your OS on the IDE drive on the small partition (of course). Then create two partitions on the SATA drive. One small partition, say 10Gigs. Use Acronis to backup drive C: to that small partition on the SATA drive periodically. Do this backup manually, whenever you think about it. (not as critical to do automatic backups of this) Then set acronis to backup the OTHER partition on the SATA drive automatically, to the large partition of the IDE drive. That's how I'd handle it. -Dave Thanks. I'd like to avoid any system that compresses these files, if possible. Mirrored or redundant drives would be ideal for this situation. I will have to look into the True Image 9.0 and how it interacts with SATA, I guess. I need to keep the price down on this and will RAID if I *have* to as opposed to buying more software. I guess I could find two IDE drives but that limits their future and I would like to keep them as near to 700G or higher as I can afford right now. We do a lot of this work and are filling drives too quickly. Unfortunately we have a recession thing going or I would spend a lot more... it's very important to me. Thanks again! RAID IS NOT A BACKUP STRATEGY! You have to do backups as well. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com