RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
I have a PC setup with RAID1 by somebody else.
It has Asus P6T SE board with ICH10R. Upon booting, the BIOS whinges that a disk is degraded, giving serial number thereof. Then Windows also pops up a helful alert that disk on port3 is degraded and that human should replace offending item. Instead, I went into BIOS and changed SATA settings from RAID to IDE, then ran Seagate disk toola on both disks. It says SMART is okay for both, so I ran long diagnostic. Both disk pass. So maybe I have intermittent fault, either drive or controller? They have done 33000 hours, so perhaps time for a trade-in... |
RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
|
RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
|
RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
|
RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
|
RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
In the last episode of ,
Mark F said: I thought the main difference for drives intended for RAID was that the internal error recovery was defaulted to time limited techniques, so an error would be returned in a couple of seconds (or less), rather than after a 5 minute (or longer) attempt. They're supposedly better able to handle the vibration involved with being installed in an array of similar drives, although whether that's true or not is a matter of some debate. -- Proof that evolution CAN go in reverse |
RAID disk "degraded" but divorced they are happy
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 6:57:05 PM UTC+8, Mark F wrote:
See also: https://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers...lack)-and-raid TLER is discussed WD also say that the consumer blue and green drives are satisfactory for simple 2-drive RAID 0 or 1. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com