|
Tom Scales wrote:
Yes, I said that before you edited it out. Why did you? "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Two layers. Which means twice as much data per DVD. The single layer DVDs hold 4.7 GB, the dual layer ones 9.something Missed it - perhaps because of top posting not intended as a flame, BTW |
LaVacheQuiRit wrote:
The organic entity known as Sparky communicated the following: Tom Scales wrote: Two layers. Which means twice as much data per DVD. The single layer DVDs hold 4.7 GB, the dual layer ones 9.something I think the correct number is something like 8.5 GB. You're right, I was guessing. From: http://www.dvdrw.com/press/duallayer.htm Philips will demonstrate its new dual-layer DVD recordable technology at the DVD+RW Alliance booth at the CEATEC* JAPAN 2003 exhibition in Makuhari (Chiba, Japan) from October 7 to 11. Developed by Philips Research in cooperation with MKM (Mitsubishi Kagaku Media)/Verbatim, the technology virtually doubles data storage capacity on DVD recordable discs from 4.7 Gbyte to 8.5 Gbyte while remaining compatible with existing DVD Video players and DVD-ROM drives. |
Yes, top posting is so much clearer and more convenient.
Only die-hard people resistant to change have not yet recognized it. Most seem to be academicly related. "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Yes, I said that before you edited it out. Why did you? "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Two layers. Which means twice as much data per DVD. The single layer DVDs hold 4.7 GB, the dual layer ones 9.something Missed it - perhaps because of top posting not intended as a flame, BTW |
Tom Scales wrote:
Yes, top posting is so much clearer and more convenient. Only die-hard people resistant to change have not yet recognized it. Most seem to be academicly related. Now that *does* sound like a flame. :) |
FYI
I installed a Lite-On LDW-451S in my 4550 (a basic 4X) and with the help at this website: http://www.cdfreaks.com/ I changed the firmware and made it a SOHW-832S (which is an 8X dual-layer recorder) Lite-On is an inexpensive...but very good drive. Burning DVDs is rewarding...but takes quite a bit of study and research to fathom. (compared with burning cds) |
Sarcasm, sarcasm.
The original poke about top-posting was a flame :) s "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Yes, top posting is so much clearer and more convenient. Only die-hard people resistant to change have not yet recognized it. Most seem to be academicly related. Now that *does* sound like a flame. :) |
Tom,
I agree with you, except the academically part. :-) Nothing more frustrating than scrolling down a rather long post to read a one line reply. Top post rules! The exception would be to make a point by point rebuttal to a long post. Paul "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... Yes, top posting is so much clearer and more convenient. Only die-hard people resistant to change have not yet recognized it. Most seem to be academicly related. "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Yes, I said that before you edited it out. Why did you? "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Two layers. Which means twice as much data per DVD. The single layer DVDs hold 4.7 GB, the dual layer ones 9.something Missed it - perhaps because of top posting not intended as a flame, BTW |
The academic part was tongue-in-cheek since Sparky has an edu domain.
"Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast dot net wrote in message ... Tom, I agree with you, except the academically part. :-) Nothing more frustrating than scrolling down a rather long post to read a one line reply. Top post rules! The exception would be to make a point by point rebuttal to a long post. Paul "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... Yes, top posting is so much clearer and more convenient. Only die-hard people resistant to change have not yet recognized it. Most seem to be academicly related. "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Yes, I said that before you edited it out. Why did you? "Sparky" wrote in message ... Tom Scales wrote: Two layers. Which means twice as much data per DVD. The single layer DVDs hold 4.7 GB, the dual layer ones 9.something Missed it - perhaps because of top posting not intended as a flame, BTW |
The organic entity known as Paul Schilter communicated the following:
Tom, I agree with you, except the academically part. :-) Nothing more frustrating than scrolling down a rather long post to read a one line reply. Top post rules! The exception would be to make a point by point rebuttal to a long post. Scrolling? Why not just use the "skip quoted text" button? -- Hans |
Why should I have to click a button to get to the bottom when the right way
to post is top-post? "LaVacheQuiRit" wrote in message ... The organic entity known as Paul Schilter communicated the following: Tom, I agree with you, except the academically part. :-) Nothing more frustrating than scrolling down a rather long post to read a one line reply. Top post rules! The exception would be to make a point by point rebuttal to a long post. Scrolling? Why not just use the "skip quoted text" button? -- Hans |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com