HardwareBanter

HardwareBanter (http://www.hardwarebanter.com/index.php)
-   General (http://www.hardwarebanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Xeon spanked by Opteron again; how will Itanium2 fare ? (http://www.hardwarebanter.com/showthread.php?t=81570)

rms December 17th 03 06:49 PM

Xeon spanked by Opteron again; how will Itanium2 fare ?
 
Anandtech's review pretty much hammers the coffin shut on Xeons, it looks to
me.

I am curious about the relative price of the Opteron vs Xeon systems.
Pricewatch has the Xeon at $300 while the Opteron 248 is $1000. What is an
average total system cost for one vs the other, and what about
support/reliability issues? No mention of these in the article.

rms



Rob Stow December 18th 03 12:56 AM

rms wrote:

Anandtech's review pretty much hammers the coffin shut on Xeons, it looks to
me.

I am curious about the relative price of the Opteron vs Xeon systems.
Pricewatch has the Xeon at $300 while the Opteron 248 is $1000. What is an
average total system cost for one vs the other, and what about
support/reliability issues? No mention of these in the article.

rms



$300 will get you a 2.8 GHz Xeon with 512 KB L2 cache
and no L3 and even worse performance than the ones used
in the AnandTech benchmarks: basically the same processor
with 2 MB of L3 cache tacked on, plus another $3000 tacked
onto the price.

Performance-wise, the best Opty to compare against your $300
Xeon is probably the Opty 240 ($191).


There is also the 3.2 GHz Xeon with 512 KB L2 & 1 MB L3 for $950.
Dualies built around that processor seem to split the
benchmarks against the Opty 246 (2 GHz, 1 MB L2).

There are many other Opty vs Xeon benchmarks out there.
I like this one: http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000275



--
Reply to newsgroup only please. This e-mail account is real
but effectively abandoned because of excessive spamming.

daytripper December 18th 03 01:24 AM

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:49:35 GMT, "rms" wrote:

Anandtech's review pretty much hammers the coffin shut on Xeons, it looks to
me.

I am curious about the relative price of the Opteron vs Xeon systems.
Pricewatch has the Xeon at $300 while the Opteron 248 is $1000. What is an
average total system cost for one vs the other, and what about
support/reliability issues? No mention of these in the article.


I bet the Xeon price you saw was for a low-end Prestonia or perhaps an ancient
Foster DP processor.

Now go look for the top of the line Gallatin MP with at least the 2MB cache...

/daytripper (hint: it's a *lot* more money)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com