InCD and DirectCD
 

Not the same thing. Both packet write, but DirectCD can use CD-Rs , whereas
InCD required you to use the less reliable and more costly CD-RW media. I
use DCD every day, all day, and it works flawlessly. BTW, do your best to
pay no attention at all to the three-initial Roxio basher that fouls this
n/g with his insane little rants. Find our for yourself what a software
package will or will not do for you.

"SHRED" wrote in message
news:FqEIa.94390$hd6.87916@fed1read05...
Same thing or is one any better?

Jeff Hansman wrote:

Not the same thing. Both packet write, but DirectCD can use CD-Rs , whereas
InCD required you to use the less reliable and more costly CD-RW media. I
use DCD every day, all day, and it works flawlessly. BTW, do your best to
pay no attention at all to the three-initial Roxio basher that fouls this
n/g with his insane little rants. Find our for yourself what a software
package will or will not do for you.

Are these rants? Whose rants are these? Is something bashing DirectCD?

=====================
From: Mike Richter (cRoxio Shill)
Date: 8/19/02

I have used only DCD for packet writing,
have had no problems due to the software -
but too many due to the format itself

to bother with it any longer.

=====================
From: Mike Richter (cRoxio Shill)
Date: 6/17/02

uninstalled DCD
when I stopped testing for Roxio
=====================

The above Mikey's statement is the first ever case in which a Shill is
rejecting the very product IT is shilling for.

With a Shill like this, cRoxio doesn't need any critics!

--------------------------
cRoxio, Eat Your Heart Out !!!
--------------------------

Please note the *NEW* Abuse addy for SMH...

Be sure to mention this psychotic has been suspended from Usenet posting
many times; most recently from Giganews. As he may be just
circumventing abuse reports there, please continue to address them to
GIganews also until they state he is no longer a customer for TOS abuse.

X-Abuse-Report:


;



"smh" wrote in message
...