|
|
Is VLC 3.0.3 for Windows 7?
On 8/9/2018 5:42 AM, Ant wrote:
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 8/6/2018 6:51 AM, wrote: I am currently running 2.2.4 Weatherwax on a 64 bit Win 7 machine. Should (can I) upgrade to VLC 3.0.3? Just try it! If you don't like it, you can always fall back to the old one. Just keep a copy of the old version. Ditto. He could aluse the portable versions. VLC's installer and distributor are still very responsible. Just download the installer package directly from **official** website. No mess will be left behind under normal operation. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
Is VLC 3.0.3 for Windows 7?
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" wrote in
: On 8/9/2018 5:42 AM, Ant wrote: Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 8/6/2018 6:51 AM, wrote: I am currently running 2.2.4 Weatherwax on a 64 bit Win 7 machine. Should (can I) upgrade to VLC 3.0.3? Just try it! If you don't like it, you can always fall back to the old one. Just keep a copy of the old version. Ditto. He could aluse the portable versions. VLC's installer and distributor are still very responsible. Just download the installer package directly from **official** website. No mess will be left behind under normal operation. From the official VLC web page: Windows requirements VLC runs on all versions of Windows, from Windows XP SP3 to the last version of Windows 10. If for some reason you don't like 3.0.3 I still have 2.2.8 and 3.0.0 on my hard drive. |
film vs CMOS
On 8/12/2018 12:50 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: But how do you get a 100% TRUE lossless original? Using good, old film-based cameras? :) film is more lossy than digital. I don't know much about photography films. And you might need to talk about the size (length x width) as well as the resolution of the senors and films! But isn't film molecular level? :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
film vs CMOS
In article , Mr. Man-wai
Chang wrote: But how do you get a 100% TRUE lossless original? Using good, old film-based cameras? :) film is more lossy than digital. I don't know much about photography films. clearly. And you might need to talk about the size (length x width) as well as the resolution of the senors and films! yep. But isn't film molecular level? :) everything is. |
film vs CMOS
On 8/12/2018 1:10 AM, nospam wrote:
I don't know much about photography films. clearly. And you might need to talk about the size (length x width) as well as the resolution of the senors and films! yep. But isn't film molecular level? :) everything is. Is your claim based on traditional size of film, which is 135? But why can't we use a bigger film then? Should we always compare 135 film against CMOS sensors of different size? -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
film vs CMOS
In article , Mr. Man-wai
Chang wrote: I don't know much about photography films. clearly. And you might need to talk about the size (length x width) as well as the resolution of the senors and films! yep. But isn't film molecular level? :) everything is. Is your claim based on traditional size of film, which is 135? size doesn't change anything. film is very lossy and much less accurate than digital. But why can't we use a bigger film then? we can. there are larger film sizes, namely medium format and large format, but then you also have to use a larger digital sensor to match. Should we always compare 135 film against CMOS sensors of different size? always the same size format. otherwise it's not a valid comparison. |
how original is an original image?
On 8/12/2018 2:08 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: But how do you determine how close a digital image get to the original without a reference? You have to have a control as in experiment! the reference is the original In a court trial, how do you do that? You cannot take the physical reality into a court... there is also the time factor. Whatever happened in reality might not repeat itself before the court. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
film vs CMOS
On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 00:54:04 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: On 8/12/2018 12:50 AM, nospam wrote: In article , Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: But how do you get a 100% TRUE lossless original? Using good, old film-based cameras? :) film is more lossy than digital. I don't know much about photography films. And you might need to talk about the size (length x width) as well as the resolution of the senors and films! But isn't film molecular level? :) Film is quantized to grain size. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics |
film vs CMOS
On 8/12/2018 1:19 AM, nospam wrote:
Should we always compare 135 film against CMOS sensors of different size? always the same size format. otherwise it's not a valid comparison. In reality, we just need to do the job right and fair, not about comparison or superiority! What if... a big what if.... all CMOS on Earth were fried by solar storm? Maybe that explained why a man is up there in ISS. :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
film vs CMOS
In article , Mr. Man-wai
Chang wrote: Should we always compare 135 film against CMOS sensors of different size? always the same size format. otherwise it's not a valid comparison. In reality, we just need to do the job right and fair, not about comparison or superiority! you're the one making comparisons. What if... a big what if.... all CMOS on Earth were fried by solar storm? Maybe that explained why a man is up there in ISS. :) what if you stopped posting rubbish? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com