|
|
Nvidia is unfairly excluding Intel chipsets by
YKhan
I found this hilarious, Intel is now getting its chipsets artificially
excluded *by* other manufacturers like Nvidia. There's no reason why
Nvidia should exclude SLI on Intel chipsets, except it wants to
maintain an artificial competitive advantage over Intel. Revenge is
ironic.
Pentium Extreme...
|
February 20th 06 06:47 PM
by YKhan
|
0 |
358 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
489 |
|
|
Commodity processors: coming soon? by
tony
Is it possible for some company (not Intel or AMD of course, probably not even VIA)
to produce a $10 or $20 processor? The "internet appliance" machine (from Walmart?)
could use one of those. Can't someone go back to old technology (not 45nm!) and
make the cheap part?
Tony
( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
|
February 20th 06 02:19 PM
by Keith
|
36 |
1,033 |
|
|
Opteron 165: when will warehouses run out of 'em? by
[email protected]
Like it says, when will we stop seeing Opteron 165s one the price
lists? And, when it disappears off the charts, how much will an
Opteron 170 or higher cost at that time? Will prices continue to trend
steadily upward as supply dwindles, or would the prudent buyer be
smarter waiting for prices to...
|
|
6 |
270 |
|
|
Intel Core Duo USB Woe's! by
[email protected]
This might be old news to some of the regulars here but I thought it
was very interesting reading.
http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=2693
I find that at times that anand has some good insight and some good
articles, they also have an article on Newegg, which I thought was also
a good...
|
|
1 |
292 |
|
|
Pentium M 760 versus Turion 64 ML-44 by
YKhan
Again the test is showing that Pentium M's get better power consumption
under heavy load, but Turions get better power consumption under light
loads.
Intel's Pentium M 760 versus AMD's Turion 64 ML-44 - The Tech Report -
Page 1
http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q1/pentiumm-vs-turion64/index.x?pg=1
( 1 2)
|
|
10 |
652 |
|
|
Hi-tech ice cream anybody?... MooBella by
George Macdonald
http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2006/020606cooltools.html
It's not Internet - even higher tech but as the caption says: "Is this a
great country or what?":-) Now... about that nano-brewery I was thinking
of, I wonder......
--
Rgds, George Macdonald
|
|
1 |
272 |
|
|
ratings on Google Groups by
YKhan
Has anyone noticed the new feature on Google Groups that allows you to
rate a message from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). It even works on Usenet
messages through Google Groups. Obviously a proprietary feature only
available if you access Usenet through GG, not if you're accessing it
directly.
Yousuf...
( 1 2)
|
|
13 |
647 |
|
|
RAM by
Paulo
Imam
1GB RAMA DDR400
novo garancija 600kn
091 506 53 65
|
February 16th 06 02:14 PM
by Paulo
|
0 |
181 |
|
|
Opteron 939 Price-Trends? by
[email protected]
A month back, I read that AMD was slashing its Opteron prices to let go
of inventory before releasing socket M2. Lately, I've been watching
AMD CPU prices rather hawkishly (the darling being the 3200+ Venice).
Generally, we're watching stable prices with occasional dips, but
lately I've seen...
|
February 16th 06 01:09 AM
by johns
|
7 |
437 |
|
|
just for laughs by
Yousuf Khan
Eddie Grove wrote:
How many errors can you find in this article?
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/chips/0,39020354,39251058,00.htm
If the reporter is accurate, and the "chief architect" is actually as
clueless as it appears, it may be time to short IBM.
Eddie
( 1 2 3)
|
February 15th 06 03:24 AM
by Keith
|
26 |
738 |
|
|
Slot 3 by
Jim
AOpen AX4GE-N motherboard. Has 3 RAM slots for plain old DDR. Bios auto
setting was driving original RAM @266MHz or PC2100, 512MB.
Went to crucial website, said motherboard would take PC3200, 400MHz. Bought
two 512MB modules, single sided. Installed both at slots 1 and 2. Bios
still ran RAM...
|
|
3 |
363 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
316 |
|
|
Who needs a clock? by
Jan Panteltje
http://www.handshakesolutions.com/Products_Services/ARM996HS/Index.html
These people do without....
( 1 2)
|
February 14th 06 02:18 AM
by Keith
|
10 |
537 |
|
|
Upgrade path for Sempron 3000 32-bit by
[email protected]
I have the above. Generally happy with the performance.
However in the future I'd like a Turion of some sort.
The ML34 sounds decent at 1.8 GHz and 1Mb cache.
However I don't think it'll be a huge performance increase over the
already 1.8GHz Sempron.
What about an ML30 which is 'only' 1.6GHz...
|
|
5 |
325 |
|
|
Did Intel ever develop its own x86-64 a long time ago? by
Yousuf Khan
There was a rumour not so long ago, after Intel had copied the AMD64
instruction set that Intel had already developed and abandonned its own
extensions a long time ago, so it wasn't really copying AMD. I think
either Barrett or Otellini or both implied as much in some statements,
which I can't find...
( 1 2 3)
|
|
26 |
1,520 |
|
|
FAB # 25 , 30 , 36 , 40 ? by
Yousuf Khan
Ed wrote:
What does the AMD FAB # represent?
I'm guessing.....
FAB 25 - 2ND GENERATION? 1995?
FAB 30 - 3RD GENERATION? 2000?
FAB 36 - 3RD GENERATION? 2006?
FAB 40 - 4TH GENERATION? 2010?
Yes.
|
|
0 |
201 |
|
|
Skype: only an Intel dual-core is powerful enough for us by
YKhan
Well, at least they're being honest about the link-up. But it does make
Intel look petty that they're ordering Skype to create a purposefully
crippled version for non-Intel processors.
When Intel calls, Skype listens | CNET News.com
"Intel's Core Duo and Pentium D processors have been designated...
|
February 10th 06 08:13 PM
by YKhan
|
6 |
569 |
|
|
intel d845pebt2 upgrade by
caver
I have a relatively archaic d845pebt2 from intel with a 2.0Ghz celeron
and want to upgrade it. anyway, its been very hard to find a P4 533FSB
and 512Kb cache at a good speed. The supported processor list provided
by intel has been updated a year ago so I dont know if my board will
support a P4...
|
February 10th 06 04:54 PM
by caver
|
0 |
454 |
|
|
FAB # 25 , 30 , 36 , 40 ? by
Keith
In article ,
says...
What does the AMD FAB # represent?
I'm guessing.....
FAB 25 - 2ND GENERATION? 1995?
FAB 30 - 3RD GENERATION? 2000?
FAB 36 - 3RD GENERATION? 2006?
FAB 40 - 4TH GENERATION? 2010?
|
February 10th 06 01:20 PM
by Keith
|
0 |
245 |