PDA

View Full Version : Whoah!


Strontium
July 3rd 03, 09:15 AM
Just topped the list of others with my setup.

P4 2.4C
Intel D865GBF
Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)

I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe, 800-1000
3DMarks...

Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!

I was, totally, not expecting that.


--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever there
at all.. And, I want to get free..."

Strontium
July 3rd 03, 10:21 AM
Just ran UT2003 benchmark. Is there someplace to compare, online? Just
spent last hour searching. No luck. Results, below.

Flyby:
63.635540 / 104.014900 / 303.517578 fps -- Score = 104.023140
rand[21984]


63.171356 / 149.412369 / 396.159241 fps -- Score = 149.541687
rand[13704]


Botmatch:
20.480404 / 49.142952 / 97.354958 fps -- Score = 49.170006
rand[28639]


30.974630 / 78.494148 / 153.320496 fps -- Score = 78.538834
rand[16548]


-
Strontium stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:

> Just topped the list of others with my setup.
>
> P4 2.4C
> Intel D865GBF
> Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
> 512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)
>
> I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe,
> 800-1000 3DMarks...
>
> Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!
>
> I was, totally, not expecting that.

--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever
there at all.. And, I want to get free..."

Ron Merts
July 4th 03, 09:21 AM
It's amazing what an 800Mhz FSB and dual channel DDR will do for you. And,
the GF3 Ti200 really is not a bad video card, especially for the money.

Ron

"Strontium" > wrote in message
...
> Just ran UT2003 benchmark. Is there someplace to compare, online? Just
> spent last hour searching. No luck. Results, below.
>
> Flyby:
> 63.635540 / 104.014900 / 303.517578 fps -- Score = 104.023140
> rand[21984]
>
>
> 63.171356 / 149.412369 / 396.159241 fps -- Score = 149.541687
> rand[13704]
>
>
> Botmatch:
> 20.480404 / 49.142952 / 97.354958 fps -- Score = 49.170006
> rand[28639]
>
>
> 30.974630 / 78.494148 / 153.320496 fps -- Score = 78.538834
> rand[16548]
>
>
> -
> Strontium stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:
>
> > Just topped the list of others with my setup.
> >
> > P4 2.4C
> > Intel D865GBF
> > Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
> > 512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)
> >
> > I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe,
> > 800-1000 3DMarks...
> >
> > Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!
> >
> > I was, totally, not expecting that.
>
> --
> Strontium
>
> "I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever
> there at all.. And, I want to get free..."
>
>

neopolaris
July 6th 03, 07:29 AM
I haven't purchased a card faster yet. There hasn't been a need to. It's
current, fast enough to play anything and at a good price.

neopolaris
"Strontium" > wrote in message
...
> Agreed, and agreed.
> I knew it was a good card, before, this just blew my mind though.
>
> -
> Ron Merts stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:
>
> > It's amazing what an 800Mhz FSB and dual channel DDR will do for you.
> > And, the GF3 Ti200 really is not a bad video card, especially for the
> > money.
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > "Strontium" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Just ran UT2003 benchmark. Is there someplace to compare, online?
> >> Just spent last hour searching. No luck. Results, below.
> >>
> >> Flyby:
> >> 63.635540 / 104.014900 / 303.517578 fps -- Score = 104.023140
> >> rand[21984]
> >>
> >>
> >> 63.171356 / 149.412369 / 396.159241 fps -- Score = 149.541687
> >> rand[13704]
> >>
> >>
> >> Botmatch:
> >> 20.480404 / 49.142952 / 97.354958 fps -- Score = 49.170006
> >> rand[28639]
> >>
> >>
> >> 30.974630 / 78.494148 / 153.320496 fps -- Score = 78.538834
> >> rand[16548]
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> Strontium stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:
> >>
> >>> Just topped the list of others with my setup.
> >>>
> >>> P4 2.4C
> >>> Intel D865GBF
> >>> Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
> >>> 512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)
> >>>
> >>> I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe,
> >>> 800-1000 3DMarks...
> >>>
> >>> Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!
> >>>
> >>> I was, totally, not expecting that.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Strontium
> >>
> >> "I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever
> >> there at all.. And, I want to get free..."
>
> --
> Strontium
>
> "I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really
> ever there at all. And, I want to get free..."
>
>